Google
 

Thursday, January 31, 2008

South African Rugby, 2nd Week In The Tri Nations, Against New Zealand

What a game of rugby! From a spectator's point of view, as well as from the level and ability of the players, this is one of the best games of rugby I have ever watched. From the outset, the pace was fast, furious and hard. Many viewers were wondering how long they could keep up the frenetic pace and which team would tire first. Well, neither gave up and the blistering pace continued, to the very end. Remember the classic boxing match between Sugar ray Leonard and Roberto Duran, where they set unprecedented heights of pace and stamina? Well this was just as good.

The 2 best rugby teams in the world squared off in Durban, on Saturday and the hype and publicity given to this epic battle, all week, was certainly not understated. The All Blacks fielded their strongest team and announced that they intended taking the fight to the Springboks, up front among the forwards. The new Springbok team, rely heavily upon the strengths of their burly forwards and have beaten many experienced teams, by capitalising on the play of the forwards and by controlling the ball up front and not allowing it to move out, among the opposition backline. The All Blacks took on the SA forwards, at their own game and they certainly did this well. The Kiwis virtually closed down the Springbok forwards, in power shown in scrums, rucks and mauls, but could not dominate in the lineouts. The pairing of Springboks Victor Matfield and Bakkies Botha were superb and showed why they are rated the top locks in the world. An equally important battle, was that of the world's top 2 fetchers. All Black flanker, Ritchie McCaw and Bok Schalk Burger, were outstanding and their work rate was incredibly high and extremely impressive.

The Springboks, still without captain John Smit and lacking a couple of their top players, through injury in the game against Australia, took control in the opening minutes and retained the edge and points lead, throughout the first half. Mictor Matfield was good, as replacement captain, but somehow never really showed the control, that is Smit's trademark and Smit's bulk was sorely missed in the front rank. Hopefully this will silence his critics.

The SA halfback combination of Butch James at flyhalf and Ruaan Pienaar at scrumhalf, both from the Sharks, was superb. James marshalled his troops and took control of the backs, while Pienaar was simply brilliant. James intercepted a Kiwi pass and scored a brilliant individual try and Pienaar slotted a penalty, from 53 metres out. At half time the Springboks led 11-6 and still had the upper hand.

Immediately the second half started, the All Blacks stepped their game up by a notch and looked very threatening, but the Boks held on to their slim lead. Unfortunately, James left the field with a minor injury and surprisingly, he was substituted by Frans Steyn. I think this was a big mistake. The 20 year old has oodles of talent and was last weeks hero, with 2 drop goals, which actually won the game against the Aussies, but this time he could not do anything right. He fumbled and dropped passes and looked confused. He lacks game time at this level and having to take over from an in form James, at the pivotal role of flyhalf, was just too big an ask. Perhaps he would have settled better at wing, or centre, or even at fullback, with Montgomery taking over at flyhalf, but he just couldn't meet the challenge on the day. The loss of James and a yellow carded Pedrie Wannenburg were enough for the All Blacks to gain ascendancy and take more control of the game.

Now, as has become customary these days, both coaches decided to use the bench and brought on "fresh legs". This is what made the difference. The Kiwis brought on tough, experienced players as subs, while the Boks had to dig deep and send on talented, but inexperienced youngsters. The game turned drastically and the All Blacks could not be stopped. In the space of about the last 14 minutes of play, the All Blacks scored an equal amount of points and sealed their victory. The final score was 26-21 to the all Blacks. This was a hard fought battle and a deserved victory for them, but the Springboks have nothing at all to be ashamed of.

While the Springboks were brimming with confidence, after a most successful Super 14 campaign and three wins in three tests, leading up to the Tri Nations and then another win in the fist game against the Wallabies, it is plainly obvious, that the top men are tired and bruised, whereas the All Blacks have had several weeks rest. The Springbok management team will have a hard job, to decide who to rest and who to send overseas, but they must rest their top players. The youngsters in the squad, are individually brilliant and talented, but lack top level game time, so when do they get this time? Surely not against the world's best? With the World Cup just around the corner, the Sprinboks look very impressive, but do have a couple of problems to work out in the next few weeks. John Smit will be welcomed back as captain and Fourie DuPreez will be hard pressed to come back from injury and regain the scrumhalf berth from Pienaar.

The All Blacks were typically humble in defeat and complimented a very strong Springbok team. In this wonderful game there were no losers. The Boks are top of the log on 5 points, after 2 games, then the All Blacks on 4 and the Wallabies on 1 point. What will happen when the Springboks travel to Australia and New Zealand? Watch this space.

Derek Robson is an up and coming, South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans and non U.S folk, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He and his wife Sally have started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles, as part of Dersalsites.

To remain informed of our progress, in trying to find satisfactory alternatives, by newsletter and mail and to get recommended tools and lessons and to start your journey to wealth

Visit Derek's blog at: http://dersalsites.com/southafricanbusiness Sally has a passion for gardening. Visit her website at http://dersalsites.com/gardening and her blog at: http://dersalsites.com/sallysgardeningtips

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

South Africa Wins The Super 14 Rugby Trophy For The First Time In History

History has been made, with South Africa assured of victory in the Super 14 Rugby Tournament. Each year five New Zealand teams, four Australian teams and five South African teams meet in what has become known as the clash of the titans in Southern Hemisphere rugby.

This year after thirteen grueling rounds, the Coastal Sharks from Durban, ended up log leaders, at 45 points. They were followed by the Canterbury Crusaders and the Auckland Blues, both on 42 points and at second and third places, respectively. The Australian outfit, the Brumbies, were in fourth spot, with only one match still to be played, between the Blue Bulls from South Africa and the Queensland Reds, from Australia. On the 6th of May 2007, the Bulls needed to win the game, earn 5 points and beat the Reds, by a score of at least 72, in order to overtake the Brumbies and slip in at fourth spot. Any thing less would leave them in fifth place and out of the semi finals. They produced an almost impossible feat by winning the game 92 - 3 and not only made the top four, but overtook the Crusaders and the Blues on points, to slip into second place. All three ended on 42 points.

Thus the Blues, who had enjoyed top place, for most of the competition and the Crusaders, who were the defending champions, were relegated to third and fourth places, with the two South African teams, holding the top two spots and hosting the semi final games at home. The Sharks had reached the semi finals, five times, in years passed and reached the finals twice before, but had always had to play away games and lost both. The Bulls reached the semis last year, edging the Sharks out of semi final contention, by only a couple of points. This was the first time ever, that South Africa had had two teams in the semi finals and hosting both games. The Aussies were completely blown out, of the semi final stakes. South Africa, in mourning after the recent poor form, of the Proteas cricket team, at the recent world cup, were ecstatic at this historic accomplishment.

The country came alive with anticipation and the main subject of conversation, all week, was whether one of our teams would make the finals. Well, at least if one of the teams won their match, South Africa was assured of reaching the finals. If the Sharks won, then they were assured of a home final. If the Bulls won, then although they were in the finals, they would have to play in New Zealand.

By the time Saturday 12th May 2007 arrived, the tension was unbearable. The weather was beautiful and the whole country was abuzz, with excitement. The tickets for the two big matches, had all been sold by early in the week and adverts offering tickets on the black market, were rife. Everybody unable to attend the game, were assembled in homes and pubs around the country, waiting eagerly for the two big games. The Sharks were up first, meeting the Blues at 15.00pm, followed by the Bulls and Crusaders at 17.30pm SA time.

The Sharks lost a little concentration around midway through their game, but came back strongly in the last 20 minutes of the game. It was an exciting match, with both teams playing scintillating rugby. The Sharks scored 3 tries, to the two by the Blues. This was truly the clash of the titans and a very physical encounter. The Sharks fought hard and overcame all obstacles, to win 34 - 18 and secured a definite home final. The crowds at the stadium and across the country, erupted in pure joy, at this historic achievement. Now it was the turn of the Bulls. Could they possibly pull off a win and make history, by creating a home final, between the two South African teams?

This was a totally different game. It was scrappy, unentertaining and not very exciting. No tries were scored and the only points recorded were from penalty kicks. It became a case of forcing errors to claim the penalty, but the mighty Bulls prevailed and kicked themselves into the final against the Sharks. The score ended at 27 - 12. The crowds, already in full celebratory moods, at the earlier victory, erupted again and the drinks and cheers ran through the night. South Africa had achieved the almost impossible, by beating the top two New Zealand teams and placing themselves in the history books, by holding the first ever final game at home, between the top two South African teams.

The Sunday papers were extra thick, with rugby stories, statistics and pictures. Many people woke on Sunday with sore heads and disbelief, at how their fortunes had changed, overnight. Tickets are selling furiously for the big match, in Durban, on Saturday 19th May 2007, and are expected to be sold out by early in the week. Durban as a city, has found itself in the enviable position of a major boom, with hotels and accommodation expected to be completely sold out. This will bring thousands of people flocking to Durban for the week-end and will produce millions of Rands in turnover.

No matter, whether the Sharks, or the Bulls win on Saturday, the Super 14 Rugby Trophy will definitely come to South Africa for the year, for the first time. Well done to both the Sharks and the Bulls.

Derek Robson is an up and coming South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet.

He has started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles as part of Dersalsites

You can get Derek's Free Training course here http://www.dersalsites.com/course/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Saturday, January 26, 2008

South Africa Win The Super 14 Rugby Cup Finals

Last weekend saw history being made when both South African teams, namely the Coastal Sharks from Durban and the Blue Bulls from Pretoria, both won their semi final games against the two New Zealand teams, the Auckland Blues and the Canterbury Crusaders, respectively. No matter whether the Bulls or the Sharks won the final game, the cup was still to stay in South Africa. Well, they forgot to tell that to the South African rugby mad supporters. All 54000 tickets to the game in Durban were sold within hours on Monday and the whole country was divided into either Sharks supporters, or Bulls supporters.

The week was full of excitement and hype and this was certainly the greatest rugby coup, since 1995, when South Africa made it to the World Cup Final, against New Zealand. We won that match and again, it seemed that S.A could not lose now either. But, tickets were sold on the black market, competitions were held with tickets as prizes, the radio and TV stations were fixated with Saturdays game and urged the rugby public to phone in to the shows. Newspapers and magazines were full of rugby trivia and in pubs around the country, the only conversation taking place was rugby talk. The whole country was abuzz in the run up to Saturday's big match.

Thousands of people took a days leave from their places of employment, in order to get ready and get themselves to Durban, early. Accommodation in hotels, hostels and bed & breakfast establishments were all completely fully booked, days in advance. Both the supporters clubs were making forecasts, laying down challenges and preparing cars, outfits and anything else that could be adapted to the official colours and symbols of the teams. On Friday the traffic rush started to descend on Durban. Cars were seen with streamers, ribbons, flags and other paraphernalia. Bottle stores and butcheries were hard pressed to supply the demand on them by aspirant party goers and braaiers. The big day had arrived.

The bookies had the Bulls slightly ahead as favourites, but the locals were having no part of that and the odds swayed back and forth. Every pub, hotel, club and household in the country were busting at the seams with noisy rugby fans. At 15.00 pm the whistle blew to start the big game, the clash of the Titans.

The game was fast, hard, furious, aggressive, noisy, body-crunching, frenetic, scintillating and any other adjective to describe the perfect conditions. The weather was glorious, the country united in their love of rugby, but divided in to two very clearly defined supporter's camps.

Throughout the game, the Sharks seemed to be the better team, they were just a few points up, for almost the entire match, but it was always anybody's game, as the scores were so close and as they say, "it's not over til the fat lady sings". Never could anyone have realised just how prophetic this harmless adage would prove to be.

A fast, furious and frenetic match built to the most dramatic climax imaginable as, with just three minutes to go, it seemed the Sharks had clinched a win against the odds when Albert van den Berg scored their second try, to put the Sharks up to 19 and the Bulls at 13. With only seconds to go, the Sharks supporters came alive in a cacophony of congratulatory applause, but little were they to realise that they were about to change the history.

Due to all the noise, nobody heard the final hooter, not even the referee. Play was allowed to continue one and a half minutes too long. The Sharks had all but stopped playing, when the Bulls knocked the ball on, in an error not seen by the ref. He allowed them to continue and the Bulls, caught the Sharks off guard and Bryan Habana scored a try, for them. The scores were now at 19 to the Sharks and 18 to the Bulls. The Sharks and all their supporters looked amazed, shocked, disbelieving and upset at this unfortunate event and all but begged and willed the ref to stop play, disallow the try, or at least consult with the t.m.o and match officials, but to no avail. He allowed the try.

The Bulls now had an opportunity to kick for poles, for another 2 points and win the match. The stadium fell silent, all attendees trying to grasp the magnitude of what was happening. At best, the Bulls could miss, forcing a draw and playing an extra 20 minutes. Please miss, was the thoughts of half the country. Please get it over were the thoughts of the other half of the country. Well, the Bulls succeeded, won the game and stole the trophy. The Bulls and their supporters were absolutely over the moon with the result, while the Sharks and their loyal fans were devastated. Many people were seen crying, some for joy, some with misery. That was it. It was over. The Bulls supporters rushed off to grab another celebratory drink. The Shark's faithful fans, just sat still, head in hands.

Actually, something strange happened after the match. The country united in glory, with Bulls and Sharks supporters hugging and shaking hands and sharing braai fires around the country. The Sharks fans conceded that the Bulls had won and the Bulls supporters felt sorry for them and admitted they were very lucky to have stolen the trophy in the dying seconds of the game. The big thing is that even though the trophy will be held in Pretoria and not Durban, it is still in South Africa. It can not be lost. It belongs to the whole country. The Super 14 tournament is considered the toughest, most physical rugby in the world and it's a long tournament, all of 16 weeks across 3 continents. The future also looks very bright. With the high standards of rugby and uniting of opposite Provincial teams, so close to the World Cup, in a couple of months, this can only bode well for the Springboks. Will we be bringing home the ultimate rugby trophy?

Run of play (as taken from S.A Rugby website)

Habana’s knockout punch was all the more devastating to the Sharks, because even the Bulls and the staunchest of their fans, would have conceded that the home-side, had deserved to win an

epic encounter, worthy of South Africa’s first Final. Not expected to stand up to the blue bulldozer for the full 80 minutes, the Sharks played with awesome passion and concentration, to knock the Bulls out of their stride. John Smit and his men were literally like Sharks in a feeding frenzy, when it came to the break-down; swarming in greater numbers and rucking aggressively, to deny the Bulls the compelling momentum, they like to build up.

Sharks coach, Dick Muir, had clearly encouraged his charges to go for broke, with the Sharks willing to have a go, from any point on the field and it nearly worked, as the home-side nosed in front of a Bulls side, forced into making errors.

The Bulls, after having much the worse of the opening ten minutes, had scored an impressive try, through Pierre Spies, in the 12th minute, after a penalty to touch, strong driving and a neat flip by Victor Matfield, but the menace of the ease, with which it was scored, soon dissipated, as Spies made a critical error, to let the Sharks back in front.

The Sharks were intent on putting pressure on the injured Fourie du Preez, through Ruan Pienaar and Butch James and a heavy hit by the latter on the scrumhalf, caused Spies to panic and try to get a 50/50 pass to Akona Ndungane -- instead the ball went to JP Pietersen and the tournament’s top try-scorer cracked on the pace, to outsprint the wrong-footed Bulls to the goalline, 50 metres away.

Although Percy Montgomery missed the conversion, it was 8-7 after the first quarter and the flow was with the Sharks.

A swirling wind made conditions difficult and with Johan Roets and Percy Montgomery jittery under the high ball, it seemed mistakes, as so often in Finals, would have a more important bearing, than constructive plays.

Montgomery kicked a penalty to make it 11-7 but Derick Hougaard reciprocated to cut the lead back to one point (11-10).

An up-and-under paid dividends for the Sharks, as JP Nel was caught offsides playing the ball after Roets had knocked it on and Montgomery’s kick put the Sharks 14-10 to the good, after 34 minutes.

This was still the score at the break, a point reached with the Sharks hard on attack, but in the second period, the momentum started to swing the way of the Bulls. Hougaard missed a drop, then was short with a long-range penalty and a strong breakout sparked by Gary Botha and carried on by Pedrie Wannenburg, was snuffed out right on the corner.

Possession of the ball and field position was starting to favour the Bulls, but an excellent piece of recycling came to naught, when James made a crunching tackle on Wynand Olivier, as he

crashed through inside Matfield.

However, the Sharks were forced to concede a penalty and Hougaard stepped up to make it 14-13, at the start of the final quarter.

The Sharks’ tackling was nothing short of heroic, however, and with the Bulls tending to put the ball to boot too readily, plus Jaco van der Westhuyzen botching a comfortable drop attempt from the ten-metre line and Butch James getting away with a cruel knock-on behind his own line, when the bouncing ball bobbled away from him, the crescendo rising from the King’s Park ramparts signalled that the majority of fans, were beginning to sense a night of celebrations, at the world’s biggest braai.

This confidence was not misplaced. The Sharks had got their well-drilled pick-and-go operating again and a penalty to touch, enabled Johann Muller to claim the lineout and set in motion a potent drive. The Sharks were held up, once, twice and then Albert van den Berg, on for Johan Ackermann, stretched that elastic body of his, off the side and squeezed the ball over the line.

There might have been a question, about whether Van den Berg had placed, or rolled the ball over the line, but not in the mind of referee Steve Walsh (who it must be said had an excellent game) who raised his hand to award a try.

The score was 19-13 and with Montgomery having been subbed, it fell to Francois Steyn to try to add the extra two points that, with less than three minutes left to play, would have put the Bulls two scores behind.

But, Steyn missed and it meant the Bulls could still win, with a converted try, but to do that they had to keep ownership of the ball and the trouble was that the oval of abused latex, was with the Sharks.

But then James, followed by Steyn, made crucial errors, by failing to get the ball into touch with panic-stricken clearance kicks and with Van der Westhuyzen and Ndungane making spirited runs, the Bulls stormed into the red zone.

At a ruck, it seemed as though the Bulls had had the ball taken off them, but somehow it emerged back on their side and went frantically from hand to hand, without seeming to pose any real threat, before a speculative wide pass to the right, by Adams, reached Habana and the speedy wing cut back in from the five-metre dotted line, crossed the 15-metre line and then suddenly straightened off his left foot, to surge through and soar over the line, with the clock showing 81 minutes and 36 seconds.

Hougaard still had to make sure of the conversion, but even though the Sharks charged out, they were stopped by the referee and remained loitering in front of the kicker, Pretoria’s 'Liefling' made no mistake, to give the Bulls the most improbable of victories and providing a home for the Super 14 Trophy in Pretoria.

Derek Robson is an up and coming South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He has started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles as part of Dersalsites http://derek.elitecoachingclub.com/newsletter/ You can get Derek's Free Training course here http://www.dersalsites.com/course/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

South Africa vs New Zealand in the 5th Week of the Tri Nations

Well, what did you think of this game? The Springbok second stringers performed very well indeed, against, arguably, the very best rugby side on the planet. Actually, this could be termed the third stringers by now, because the top 22 Springboks are being rested and another 6 are on the injury list. That’s 28 top players, which almost make up 2 teams of 15. The next on the list, were the team sent over to Australasia and of them, no more than 6 have ever played at this level.

Johan Muller did an outstanding job, as makeshift captain, after Bob Skinstad's withdrawal and he truly led by example. Muller had only previously stood in for AJ Venter, at captain, in the closing minutes of a Sharks match and Venter had, in turn, stood in for an injured John Smit, so it is fair to say that Muller had no real experience, at being captain of the team, at this level.

The Springboks could not realistically have hoped to beat the favourites, but did extremely well to contain the Kiwi attacks and minimise their scoring opportunities. Indeed, at half time, the All Blacks led by a very slim margin, with the scores at 12 - 6. The Springboks defended like demons possessed and the All Blacks must have been somewhat surprised.

Again, the game was marred by poor refereeing and it is through a poor decision, that the All Blacks took advantage and scored a very soft try. The yellow card for Wannenburg, was also a bad decision, especially as McCaw was guilty of exactly the same misdemeanour, but was not carded.

While it cannot be said, that the ref was directly responsible, for the outcome of this game, it does highlight yet again, the lack of good referees, at this level and the inconsistencies in their individual interpretations of the game. This is a very worrying factor and with the World Cup in just a few weeks time, let's hope that the ultimate winners, are not merely those that the refs smile upon. Their decisions and weaknesses, could have a tremendous influence, on what should be the ultimate test, of the best rugby playing nations in the world.

The last ten minutes of play, saw the New Zealanders suddenly wake up and put points on the board, finishing off with a score of 33 - 6. This could and perhaps should have been a whitewash, with New Zealand being expected to thrash the 'Boks, by far more points, but it shows the guts and determination of the weakened Springbok team, to have prevented a hiding.

Ruan Pienaar had a better game, this week, as did Murray, Pietersen and Cronje. Muller, van der Linde and van Heerden worked like Trojans, but Hougaard was very disappointing and Paulse was continuously out of position. Olivier also did not impress. All in all, they surprised many people with their gutsy performance.

This brings to a close, the South African campaign, for the Tri Nations cup and only one match remains. Next Saturday Australia and New Zealand will contest the ultimate result, to the title. South Africa cannot win the trophy this year, but have their sights set on a far bigger award - The World Cup.

It is a rare sight indeed, to see the coach of the losing team, smile so broadly, but Jake White has plenty to smile about. South Africa have an excellent first team and enough depth, in the form of replacements, to make selection difficult. Injury is the only factor, that White cannot control, but with him wisely having rested the big boys, this will hopefully be reduced.

Indeed, South Africa have an excellent chance of snatching the World Cup and their closest rivals will be New Zealand. Some of the chaps sent to Australasia, have showed that they may even be worth of promotion, to the World Cup squad. It will be interesting, to see who the final team is. This squad will be officially announced, on the 21st of July. One thing that White has achieved, is a special blend of players, with the experience from the old stalwarts and the raw exuberance and talent of the youngsters.

The latest betting odds on the World Cup are as follows.
New Zealand - 2/5
South Africa - 5/1
France, Australia - 10/1
Ireland - 14/1
England - 33/1
Argentina, Wales - 50/1
Scotland - 200/1
Italy - 500/1
Samoa, Fiji - 1000/1
Tonga, - 2000/1
Romania, Japan, USA, Canada, Namibia, Portugal, Georgia - 5000/1

Time will tell, but let's not forget, there is still one more game to be played, in deciding the victors, of the Tri Nations competition. Will the All Blacks, or the Wallabies triumph?

Derek Robson is an up and coming, South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans and non U.S folk, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He and his wife Sally have started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles, as part of Dersalsites.

To remain informed of our progress, in trying to find satisfactory alternatives, by newsletter and mail and to get recommended tools and lessons and to start your journey to wealth, sign up here. It's free. Click this link: http://www.dersalsites.com/newsletter We will even throw in some free software for you.

Make sure you get our course on Internet Marketing. This is a comprehensive course comprising of over 243 pages, with pictures and videos to help explain exactly what to do. This is a fantastic e-course and is broken into 13 lessons. To get your free course, click here http://dersalsites.com/course

Visit my blog at http://dersalsites.com/southafricanbusiness

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Friday, January 25, 2008

South Africa vs. Australia in The 4th Week Of Tri Nations Rugby

Well, after all the pre match publicity and the Aussies almost refusing to play a second rate weak team and with them having been huge favourites to win the match, their full strength team very nearly lost to these SA underdogs!

The Aussies looked lacklustre and were anything but sparkling, in what was not a very entertaining game of rugby, from a spectator's viewpoint. And all the negative comment, cost them big time. The crowds stayed away and the Telstra Stadium was only half full. The bad attitude of the Aussies, came back to bite them, in lost revenues.

The Springbok "second stringers" were a little better, than the lethargic and probably over confident Wallaby team expected them to be, on the day. In fact, the Springboks wasted no time in getting points on the board and after the first 16 minutes of play, they already had a tally of 17 points. They certainly stunned the Wallabies, who were at a loss, as to what was happening.

The 'Boks were not that bad, but certainly weren't that good either. Some players played their hearts out and others were abysmal. The forwards battled up front, so not much ball reached the backs. Wikus van Heerden should have been man of the match for his efforts, but this award always goes to someone in the winning team. He and Skinstad, Paulse, Murray and van Der Linde, all shone, as did the oldest man on the field, Johan Ackermann. Pienaar, Wannenburg, Van den Burgh, Pietersen and Olivier fought on, but never had a good day, while Bismarck Du Plessis, and Hougaard were terrible. Hougaard missed three penalties and in the last phase of the game, Du Plessis failed to pass inside to an unmarked Paulse, for a certain try. Those 16 lost points, are what prevented the Springboks from showing up the Wallabies and sealing an unlikely victory, but it wasn't to be.

The ref was maybe a little harsh, in sin binning first Gary Botha and then Johan Muller and the loss of Ackermann, injured after the first half hour, left a lack of power in the scrums. Skinstad cracked a rib and the 2 injured players were sent back to south Africa.

Through the loss of players, to injury and yellow cards, the Aussies were able to take advantage and convert that into points. The Springboks owned the entire first half of the match, the Aussies were able to level the scores in the 3rd quarter and then seemed to drift off into complacency, but suddenly awoke again, in the last 10 minutes and scored twice, to win the match 25 - 17.

Although the South Africans were disappointed at their loss, it is the Wallabies who will be licking their wounds. The fact that they were unable to control the game and decidedly thrash the second stringers, will be of more concern to them, than the fact that the Springboks know that they should have won. If they hadn't squandered those 16 points the result would have been somewhat different. They can rest easy, in knowing that they nearly caused an upset, but will have to right a few wrongs in their plan, before they meet New Zealand in the 4th week of the Tri Nations. The Kiwis are a much better outfit and will not have been upset by the result, or the publicity. They know what they have to do and are sure to do just that, if they want the trophy.

It is unclear at this stage, who will take over the Springbok captaincy, but one thing is for sure - they have not disgraced themselves and certainly gave the whining Aussies something to think about. Some players have actually shown, that they are worthy of being in the S.A World Cup squad and this could cause more headaches for the Springbok selectors.

Derek Robson is an up and coming South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He has started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles as part of Dersalsites http://dersalsites.com/newsletter

You can get Derek's Free Training course here http://www.dersalsites.com/course

View all my articles on Ezine Articles site http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

South Africa In The 3rd Week Of The Tri Nations

After having beaten the Wallabies, in the first week of the Tri Nations and then narrowly losing to the All Blacks, in the second round, the Springboks had a bye, in the third weekend of the competition. This would have given some of the senior players, a well deserved break. Most of the top Springboks, were chosen from the two top South African provincial franchises, the Sharks and the Blue Bulls.

These were the two teams, to progress through to the finals, of the Super 14 campaign and the tournament lasted a long 16 weeks for most of them. Immediately after the Super 14, they played England in 2 test matches and then Samoa in another. The following week, saw the opening round of the Tri Nations competition, so some of these guys, have played gruelling, top class rugby, for a whole 21 matches, without any break. It is fitting then, that the management team decided to rest all senior players and embark on their Australasian tour, with a "second string" team. With the World Cup in just a few weeks and that being the main focus, of all participating countries, injuries to the key players, are the last thing the Springboks need.

The Australian and New Zealand teams, rested their top players, for the first half of the Super 14 and England sent a very weak team, to play in South Africa. So, if France, England, New Zealand, to name a few, have all rested key players and Australia recently sent a very diluted team over to Canada, then why are they whingeing, over South Africa's attempts, to rest their players? Well, we all know what the Aussies are like, don't we? They moan about everything.

But seriously, even though our top warhorses, are missing from the travelling side, that does not mean we haven't sent good players overseas. On the contrary, we have sent some very accomplished Springboks. The likes of Skinstad, Ackerman, Visagie, Barrit, Steyn, Paulse and van den Berg and a few others, are certainly no slouches. There is a mellow blend of seasoned veterans and talented youngsters, in the team. After all, there is only space for 15 men in the team, but a squad comprises of 22 and with extras and injuries, it is closer to 45 men, who are considered worthy of wearing the Springbok colours, so are they not entitled to play as Sprinkboks?

Anyway, quite surprisingly, Australia beat New Zealand, by 20 points to 15, in the third round and they actually did South Africa a favour, as the trophy is now up for grabs and the log standings are very even. Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, each have 5 points and each has won one game, from two. New Zealand have held the trophy, since 2003.

New Zealand were ahead, throughout the game and always looked like winning. They had the territorial and possessional advantages and led on the scoreboard, up to the last quarter, but with Carl Hayman off the field, through being yellow carded, for infringements, the Aussies capitalised on the All Black's misfortune and quickly sealed the outcome, with two converted tries, to steal the game from the Kiwis.

Australia were up to their tricks again, during this last week, by insisting the matches played in Australia, use a local Aussie ball, rather than the normal Gilbert ball. They are masters of pre match publicity and try to get into their opponents heads, like Mohammed Ali used to do. Saturday will tell. The Springboks play the Wallabies, on the 7th July and then cross to New Zealand, to play the All Blacks. They will then return home and will have to wait, for the final match on the 21st July, to see who takes the Tri Nations cup this year.

Derek Robson is an up and coming, South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans and non U.S folk, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He has started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles, as part of Dersalsites

For more articles on South Africa, including sport, Springbok rugby and the Super 14 tournament, as well as the Comrades marathon and the Dusi canoe marathon, click here. http://dersalblog.blogspot.com

If you are South African, or if you live outside the U.S and you feel the same pressures as us, in the field of restrictive internet marketing tactics, please read our articles on South African and non U.S internet business. http://www.squidoo.com/southafricanbusiness/

To remain informed of our progress, in trying to find satisfactory alternatives, by newsletter and mail and to get recommended tools and lessons and to start your journey to wealth, sign up here. It's free. Click this link: http://www.dersalsites.com/newsletter/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Thursday, January 24, 2008

South Africa Beat Australia In The 1st Week Of Tri-Nations Rugby

On Saturday 16th June 2007, the Springboks kicked off their Tri Nations campaign, against a full strength Wallaby side in Newlands, Cape Town. As the first real test of the Springboks strength, against a highly rated world class side, with a long history of cohesion in the side and among the management team, this was a much awaited clash. Speculation was rife as to which was the better side and who indeed would be called upon to do team duty on the day. I was pleasantly surprised by the selections as the team looked closer to what I would consider to be the best, with 1 or 2 minor exceptions. I, personally, was happy to see the combination of the Shark's scrumhalf and flyhalf.

Personally, I don't think Ashwin Willemse is a first choice winger and I'm pleased that they left Bob Skinstad out. Sorry, but I feel that once you have had the chance of playing for the Springboks and then you leave the country for whatever reason and once you have played elsewhere for a couple of seasons, then you forfeit all future opportunities of ever playing for your country again. Especially when you captained the national team, ran a lousy campaign, were off form for the season, but continually selected and then get back in, after several years away - no ways. I don't agree with that. I don't care how talented the player is. I feel he has had his chances and there is someone else just as deserving, just as good and more patriotic. I was, of course, very pleased to see a side comprising of mostly Sharks players. I would have liked to see the young Frans Steyn start, but had to be satisfied with the fact that he was at least on the bench.

Anyway the match against the Aussies was a hard battle. Many of the younger Sprinboks, lacking experience in high level matches, should have found themselves a little out of their depth, but again due to their confidence levels after a very successful Super 14, stood up to the task admirably.

Unfortunately, one major area of concern for world rugby, is the recently highlighted weakness of the refs in the Super 14. It seems there are very few top referees, capable of blowing a top level game with any semblance of ability. A lot of horrific refereeing decisions were exposed recently and I'm sorry to say that there are very few match officials that are any good. They either make questionable decisions, lack control of the game, or are far too quick to blow the whistle, rather than letting the game flow. This match was one of these.

The referee was a young, inexperienced guy from England and this showed in the way he handled the game. He failed to stamp any kind of authority on the game and just lacked control. He also made silly decisions and was totally influenced by the cunning Aussies. When a bit of fighting broke out in the 3rd quarter, he did not even blow his whistle. He stood and watched!

The Aussies are past masters at creating pre- match controversy and using diversionary tactics and psychology to their advantage. They complained in the press that both BJ Botha and Bakkie Botha used illegal scrummaging tactics and appealed to the match officials to watch this. Well, the poor little ref made a point of watching these 2 players like a hawk and although they were not guilty as alleged by the Aussies, what he failed to notice was that the Aussies deliberately collapsed every scrum. So eager was this ref, to show that he was paying attention to their concerns, that he automatically penalised South Africa every time. The Aussies loved this and then proceeded to collapse everything from set scrum to rucks and mauls.

They took advantage of his inexperience and played a game of clever professional fouls. At one stage, after several failed attempts at crossing the SA scoreline, George Gregan cleverly swung the ball out left in to an unsuspecting Pierre Spies and then immediately claimed obstruction, from the ref. He may have hoped for a penalty try to be awarded, but must have been happy with the outcome as a penaltywas awarded and scored and a poor Spies was yellow carded and sent off for 10 minutes.

This was a hard, physical match from the onset, but after only 10 minutes, the South African captain,. John Smit injured his knee and had to leave the field. Although Victor Matfield, the Bulls skipper, took over the captaincy, the loss was obvious and the 'Boks seemed to lose some direction.

Each side scored only 1 try each, but it was due to the outstanding defence of both teams that the try tally wasn't higher. The Springboks had the lion's share of possession and territory, but the Aussie defence was rock solid. They defended like demons.

At halftime, Aussie was in the lead, although the Springboks were the first to put points on the board. Certain players really stood out and amongst those who had an outstanding game was the hard working flanker, Schalk Burger, who was later awarded man of the match.

Throughout the first 30 minutes of the second half both sides attacked and defended strongly, but it seemed the score of 19-16 to the Wallabies would remain the final score. But then a young, talented, unassuming 20 year old hero came on to the field as substitute for Ashwin Willemse and the game changed. During a desperate effort by the Springboks to cross the line, with their constant attacking efforts, continually thwarted by the Wallabies, Ruan Pienaar passed the ball back to Frans Steyn, who as cool as a cucumber kicked a drop goal. The scores were now level at 19-19 and only about 4 minutes remained.

The Springboks, inspired by their good fortune and smelling victory, launched another desperate and frenetic attack and again and again, were stopped by the Aussie defence. With only a minute or two to go, the ball again found itself in the hands of the young Steyn, who unbelievably attempted a long drop kick of all of 50 metres and succeeded with power to spare. This young man has a boot on him and can kick further than many of the top world class players. This put South Africa ahead 22-19 and all the 'Boks had to do was keep possession for a few seconds. On the sound of the hooter, the wily Butch James nonchalantly kicked the ball out of play and victory was sealed.

The young Steyn missed the last kick for the Sharks to win the Super 14 finals and allowed the Bulls to take victory, but he more than made up for that mistake in this match. So, South Africa now lead the standings in the first week of the Tri nations and face New Zealand in the next fixture in Durban.

Derek Robson is an up and coming South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He has started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles as part of Dersalsites http://www.dersalsites.com/newsletter/ You can get Derek's Free Internet Marketing Training course here http://www.dersalsites.com/course View all my articles on Ezine Articles http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Should Serge Betsen Have Been Banned?

Serge Betsen, rugby union player and stalwart of the French National team for many years. He was declared fit to play in the Rugby World Cup Semi Final against England, but anyone who saw the crack on the head he took the week before must be asking why he was allowed to play...

Of course when ask if he should be 'banned' in the title of this article, I mean 'declared unfit to play'.

Very early in the quarter final game against New Zealand, he took an almighty crash on the head. As he was going down to the ground, his head banged full contact with another player's knee, and he was knocked out cold.

He lay unconscious on the ground for a good while with a player holding his tongue to prevent swallowing, and was attended to by the medical staff.

Rugby is a hard dangerous game, played by brutes of men. That's one of the appeals of it - there is none of the weakling theatricals you get in soccer - players only stay down when they are badly hurt, and Betsen's motionless body showed everyone that it was serious.

After treatment he was able to walk off the pitch with assistance, but clearly did not know what day of the week it was. There were rumours of convulsions in the dressing room, but whatever that's true or not, the blow to his head was clear, and as can imagine, it's now a much watched clip on YouTube!

Normally when a sportsman gets concussion they have to sit a mandatory fortnight without playing, and yet a week later Betsen took the field against England.

The question is asked in many quarters therefore, why was he allowed to play - surely it was a risk to his health?

It's interesting to make a comparison with Miami Dolphins quarterback Trent Green, who was also knocked out playing his game, despite the helmet protection.

He's had many concussions in his time, and the medics have still to declare him fit again, and may force him to retire.

Apparently the difference with Serge Betsen is that he was seen by a neurologist, and once that happens, you're not liable for the enforced lay off.

Hmm...

I'm not sure about that at all - that seems to imply that players who are concussed are *not* normally seen by a neurologist, which must be a concern.

Of course I have no medical training whatsoever, so can't pass expert judgement, but I would have preferred to see him not play.

I can understand that playing for your country when the tournament is in your country is one thing, and also that rugby is a danger to your health anytime you go on the pitch, but I hope his long term health wasn't put in jeopardy, because nothing is more important than that.

Gordon Bryan is the author of 'Make Money From Sport,' a guide where he takes you through the single technique he uses again and again to profit from any sport! Find out more at: http://www.gordonbryan.com/sport

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gordon_Bryan

Semi-Final One Preview - England vs France

7 days ago you would have got great odds on a France vs England Semi-Final. Quite frankly both teams had played terribly and were facing opponents far better than them. France was paying a $5.00 return on beating the All Blacks, with the All Blacks returning just $1.08. England, despite being world cup holders have looked anything but a champion side for the past 4 years, and have had virtual knockout matches in their last two pool encounters against Samoa and then Tonga.

But World Cup isn't about who is the best over four years, it is about who is the best at one match for 80 minutes of rugby, and so the semi-final that no-one picked is the semi-final we are getting. World Champion England, against World Cup Host France.

Quite simply we should expect nothing different from other encounters between these two nations - a trench warfare battle royale.

Four years ago England smashed the French forward pack and Jonny Wilkinson kicked all the points for the English to advance onto their final, and eventually their first world cup. French rugby was shocked by that result, some would say humiliated. As a consequence they have muscled up their forward pack, and the combination of a sturdy platform that can dominate opponents and a creative backline is an intriguing, and dangerous one.

This game will almost certainly be won based on who can stamp their gameplan on it. England will be quite happy to keep things tight, play in the French half and let Jonny kick the points as the French offend. By comparison France will want to keep the ball in the English half, and will not be afraid to use their backs to attack if the opportunity presents itself.

Most expects are picking whoever wins the forward battle will dominate the game. My own feeling is that the neither team will gain ascendancy in the forwards, though they will both bash away for the entire match. The deciding factors may well be the dedication of the kick chasers. We can expect it to be tight, and both teams will be wanting to be in the opponents half. The wingers should spend the day chasing kicks, putting pressure on the guy picking up the ball and hope that they force a hurried kick or a fumble. The dedication in the chase will effect the quality of the clearance and the quality of the clearance will decide which half the game is played in. And that will be the key to this game. Whoever plays the game in their opponents half will win.

As a kiwi, I don't have a clue who I should be supporting in this game. France knocked us out of the cup, so I would love to see them dealt to. But to see England with a finals chance to defend the world cup(something no team has ever done) would just be wrong considering their dismal contribution to world rugby during their 'title reign'. I'm equally stumped on a prediction, either side could win this match, and I think for the second match in a row(for France) we may see how the referee plays the game as being the deciding factor. Unlike last week where France benefited from the referee slowing the game, France will want this game to be more open. If that happens France should get home. They have the ability and propensity to score tries. On the other hand, if the game becomes a structured kicking duel there are few better proponents that the English number ten. A slow, methodical approach would see England home, probably without a try on the board.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tom_Scott

Monday, January 21, 2008

SA Rugby

A better script for a game of rugby union could not be written, if you were supporting the home side South Africa at least. The home-side was down 16 points to 10 at half time, and only managed to draw the match at Newlands Stadium on 71 minutes. And as would be written in the same script, the young replacement Francois Steyn scored both the score-levelling kick and winning kick - drop kicks, one of them no less than 45 metres from the poles, close to the touchline. I have questioned the same guy's lack of experience and decision making capabilities but today, very fortunately for South Africa, Frans Steyn came good and did it under some serious pressure too.

The Springboks dominated most of the game (this showed in the post-match stats with the Boks having possession stacked 60%-40% in their favour) and the scoreline should have been a heck of a lot higher than 22-19 at ful time and it should certainly not have had the South African rugby team trailing at the break. The cause of the points not having a true reflection on the match was partly the Springboks un-forced errors and partly the Wallabies rushing defence. A tactic employed by the Springboks themselves. A lot of the time when the SA Rugby team found themselves on the attack in the Australian's 22 they gave the ball away in silly manners; knock-ons, the ball kicked away in a promising move and even an attacking scrum awarded to South Africa being overturned to a penalty for Australia due to Schalk Burger getting into some "argy-bargy" after the whistle had been blown.

The one and only try for the Boks was scored by centre Jacques Fourie on 13 minutes. Butch James kicked off with a grubber that set up a few phases for South Africa after which Butch James was invloved again smartly picking the ball up off his toes and pass the ball out to Fourie sending him in for the try in the corner. Shortly afterwards - in what looked to be an oversight the referee Barnes as an Australian moved involved some obstructive running in mid-field, the Cape Town stadium was hushed as Matt Giteau went over next to the posts for the Wallabies only try of the match. Another mistake by the referee and his team was the yellow-carding and resultant 10 minutes off handed to Pierre Spies. Spies seemed to simply be making his way back on-side when a George Gregan pass hit him, this was somehow adjudged to be worthy of a sin-bin.

There were definite highlights in the match for the Boks, with some deft passing between forwards and backs as well as some long passages of play where the Springboks held onto and shielding the ball very well, playing in close to the point of breakdown.

Australia's highlights in the match were Stirling Mortlock's accuracy with his boot and their excellent defence. They've proven that they will not be walk overs by any stretch of the imagination in this Tri-Nations series.

Man of the Match went to Schalk Burger for the many runs into hard contact and his ever-persistent competing for the ball at the points of breakdown.

All in all a great test match to watch, going down to the wire and Francois Steyn winning over the hearts of the Newlands sold out crowd by putting over his match-winning drop-kicks.

From the webmaster of the sports site that brings you all the latest in Rugby - All About All Sports.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Marvyn_H

Friday, January 18, 2008

Rugby World Cup Online - 3 Tips To Watch Rugby World Cup Anywhere In The World

I'm recommending 3 tips which anyone can enjoy watching the rugby world cup live matches anywhere in the world to the fullest. As a die-hard rugby fan for some years, this is the moment I have been waiting for. I can finally watch my favourite team the All Blacks doing their hakas and performing the ribs breaking actions against their rivals in the rugby world cup event.

The 1st tip is the most simple and no brainer way, just go to youtube and type "rugby world cup" in the search box and you should see a list of videos appearing. However, because it free, you can expect millions of people to do likewise and you may experience poor video quality. Each video lasts a maximum of 10 mins only, a real turn-off when the excitement is there.

The 2nd tip is to go with a group of rugby fans like you and me and find a nice pub that will broadcast the event live. I believe you can party and have a great time cheering your favourite team and booing the rivals teams, together with your friends. That would be fun.

Ok, you are a loner or does not like the crowds because they are too noisy or you are afraid of drunkards flying their drinks around. Or, you are just a lazy bum who prefers to stay at your home and watch the matches. You may be even thinking of recording all the live matches so you can burn them to dvd and keep them for future watching. Whatever the reasons, all these can be achieved by just installing a special software which you will be able to receive crystal clear, high quality live video streaming of all the rugby world cup matches. It's cheap and you don't pay a bomb for that; and yes, it works on a laptop too. I'm currently use it to watch all the matches in my home and office.

Thomas is a die-hard rugby fan and have been watching all the Rugby World Cup 2007 matches Live Online using a special software with high quality streaming video. You can click here to download the software.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Thomas_Hoi

Rugby World Cup - The Contenders

New Zealand

In the three years leading into the World Cup, New Zealand has lost just three games. One per year, and only to two Countries - Australia and South Africa(twice). It's hard to argue their credentials as favorites, but it's also a tough road for the All Blacks. They meet the six nations champions in the quarterfinals, the only team to beat them this year in the Semi-finals and the only team to beat them in a world cup final in the world cup final.

They will be playing as much to shake the 'choker' tag that they have acquired over recent world cups. When New Zealand won in 1987 they were underdogs. Every tournament since(with the possible exception of 1991) they were expected to win. With the draw they have, if they do - they will deserve to be world champions.

South Africa

South Africa last year declared themselves 'the only team capable of beating the All Blacks' which was a big claim for a team that had met the All Blacks twice that year and lost on both occasions. They did however go on to back up that claim by upsetting the All Blacks at Rustenberg in the dead rubber of the 2006 tri nations. They have a dangerous looking squad and an easier path to the final. They can expect to play Scotland in the quarterfinal, which on form should be a formality, before the physical danger of the Argentinians.

The Africans should simply have too much firepower for these opponents and will arrive at the final eager to go.

Australia

Australia should get a chance to redeem themselves for allowing rugby the embarrassment of having to call England our champions for the past four years when the two teams meet in their quarterfinal. It will be a great rematch, but ultimately the talented Australian side should destroy the bungling English and go into their semi with some form. It doesn't get any easier for the Aussies though - facing the winner of new Zealand vs France to get into a likely final with South Africa.

The Aussie team looks well balanced, has real strike power and is doing all they can to put their scrummaging problems behind them. They have two go through three of the biggest sides in international rugby to take the cup, but they have the ability to do it, and the temperament to play their best rugby at the best time. That's why they have two world cups to their name already.

France

It's all going wrong for France. Upset on center stage by the Argentinians on day one of the world cup, they now have to look forward to a date with the number one team in the world at quarterfinal time. France has only beaten New Zealand once this century - the 42-33 victory in Marseille seven years ago. Should they make it through that they would have to beat both the other tri-nations teams to take the world cup.

Now - France has the ability to rise up for a big game and pull it out of the bag. They did it two world cups ago to sink New Zealand hopes, and they can conceivably do it again. However I doubt they can do it 3 weeks in a row, and given their showings so far I doubt they will do it at all. They threw the ball around and looked great against a 14-man Namibian side, but that is the only time I have seen them play with the belief they can achieve that sort of magic. When a French side gets that belief they are a dangerous thing indeed. This one hasn't found it yet.

England

England are the current world champions until someone wins this years final, but you would have to be a pretty optimistic supporter to think England will even make it their far. Two years ago New Zealand achieved a grand slam by beating all the home nations on successive weekends. England will have to achieve a grandslam of their own against tri-nations sides to lift the world cup. And their task is even harder than that, because to even get to the knockout stage they need to topple a Tongan side that pushed South Africa to the edge last weekend.

The world cup winners of 2003 were the best organised, most complete squad at the tournament. Unfortunately they 2007 class didn't seem to learn anything from them.

Argentina

The poor cousin of world rugby struck a big blow by beating the French on day on of the world cup. It is still the only boil over of the tournament, but the effects reverberate around the tournament still. Not least of which is that the Argentinians are going to have to prove their pool topping ranking by dealing with Ireland to get to the quarterfinals. Should they do that(and they should) the Scottish should hardly slow them before a huge semi-final against the Springboks.

Argentina draws most of it's players from French rugby, and has been crying out for a place in a competition of the caliber of the tri nations or six nations. The scalp of France at home in the World Cup, and the likely scalps of Ireland and Scotland, are going to make their demands harder and harder to ignore.

Scotland

You need a certain amount of spine to win the world cup - and any side that concedes a match before the first whistle just plain doesn't have it. Sure the Scots were probably never going to beat the All Blacks, but by admitting it by fielding a second string side, they have shown a blatant lack of respect to the All Blacks, the tournament and most of all to their own home fans - some of whom paid up to $450 a ticket to see their home side take on the best in the world.

Personally, I'll be cheering for Italy next weekend.

Ireland

How much would Ireland have liked the world cup to come 12 months ago? Since then they have plodded their way through a poor preparation, suffered injuries to everyone from the captain to the waterboy and shown all the point scoring ability of a gumboot in their first pool matches. Despite this they are still an outside chance to make the quarterfinals if they can beat Argentina and claim a bonus point. On present form - they can't.

Wales

Wales, hmmmmmm. I don't know what it is about the home nations side, but they just don't seem to know what to do when they get the ball. The Welsh team on 2003 was dangerous from anywhere on the field, the 2007 vintage is only really dangerous to themselves. Wales should have enough to put away the Fijians and make it to the quarterfinals, but it would be sad if they went any further, because they don't look like the 8th best team in the world to

me.

Italy

Italy has made great strides in recent years having joined the six nations. And this is reflected by their continued showings at the world cup. Back in '87 they were blown off the park 70-6 by the All Blacks, but this year, calling on all the experience and skill they have learned in the 6 nations competition, they reduced that margin to 76-13. Hold on, there's something wrong here...

I'll say this for Italy - they fronted up, unlike the Scots. Suppose against all form the winner of the Scotland/Italy match makes the world cup final to play New Zealand. Scotland have already conceded they have not a hope of victory. At least Italy has the spine to try for it.

Tom Scott is a die hard supporter of the All Blacks and he looks forward to seeing New Zealand be the first team to retain a world cup in 2011.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tom_Scott

Rugby World Cup - Crunch Match One - Wales vs Fiji

The Welsh faithful returned to Cardiff to watch their team play Fiji at the Millenium stadium. But this week the formula had changed. The two teams were playing for a quarter final berth against the South Africans, or, an early exit from the World Cup.

The Welsh had recorded reasonably comfortable wins against Japan and Canada before their 12 point loss to the Australians. They are ranked eighth in the world and were expected to fend off a reasonably strong challenge from the Fijians.

By comparison Fiji had to work hard to account for Japan 35-31, and Canada 29-16. Australia clocked up 50 points in seeing off the Fijians, but despite the very different paths taken to arrive at this game, the formula was simple. The winner of this match would go forward, the loser was out of the cup. The Welsh had some small comfort in that if they achieved a draw, their bonus points they had accumulated would see them through.

The Welsh were methodical and structure in the opening exchanges, and went to a 3-0 lead early. but after the Welsh missed a second shot at goal the Fijians woke up. In a period of play worthy of their seven-a-side team the Fijians scored dynamic tries in quick succession and by the 24th minute they had put a point a minute on the men in red to be leading 25-3. Wales suddenly clicked into gear themselves and mounted a methodical comeback that saw them grind away at the Fijian lead, against a team that was reduced to 10 men just before half time.

The yellow carding of Quera was nearly a crucial decision. The sin-binning was a little dubious, particularly when you consider many of the other offenses that weren't punished in this match. Wales scored points with remarkable ease in this period and there was an air of inevitability about the way the Fijian lead kept getting smaller. When Martyn Williams plucked a pass out of the Fijians back line and scored his try it looked to be all over for the Fijians.

But showing the same sort of resolve which has seen Tonga do so well in this tournament the Fijians dug deep and found they really did have the reserves to win matches like this. A string of penalties and finally a hard earned try to Dewes saw the Fijians erupt in delight when the final whistle was blown with them holding the edge 38-34.

Wales can expect a grilling from their press who expect big things of their team, while the Fijians can look forward to a huge quarterfinal against a team who must now be amongst the favourites to win the cup - South Africa.

Tom Scott is a die hard supporter of the All Blacks and looks forward to seeing New Zealand be the first team to retain a world cup in 2011.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tom_Scott

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Rugby World Cup 2007

France are to host this year's Rugby World Cup Final and the contest kicks off in St. Denis, on the 7th of September and finishes with the final, also in St. Denis, on the 20th of October. Obviously, apart from the quarter finals, the semi finals and the finals, each team plays 4 matches. These matches are determined, by means of a draw. The rugby playing nations total 20 this year and are divided into 4 pools, of 5 teams each. The top contestants are New Zealand, South Africa, Australia and England, but in with a chance, are others such as Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Argentina.

Some typically non rugby playing nations, such as Japan, Canada and the US also enter this competition, but as game as they are, they are no match for the top teams. Typically, as with most sports these days, the bookmakers and the punters are actively involved and large bets are placed.

One area of concern this year, is the standard of refereeing. We have seen over the past few months, some questionable decisions. This has been apparent in the recent Super 14, the Tri Nations and in several test matches. Let's hope, that the world Cup is decided by the best team on the day and not by some poor refereeing decisions. There does not seem to be any consistency between refs, of the different countries and their individual interpretations of the rules. Further confusion has been evident, due to the new rules and some teams have learnt to exploit these loopholes to perfection.

This year's group pools are as follows.

Group A: England, South Africa, Samoa, Tonga, USA

Group B: Australia, Canada, Fiji, Japan, Wales

Group C: Italy, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Scotland

Group D: Argentina, France, Georgia, Ireland, Namibia

Latest betting odds are:

New Zealand - 2/5

South Africa - 5/1

France, Australia - 10/1

Ireland - 14/1

England - 33/1

Argentina, Wales - 50/1

Scotland - 200/1

Italy - 500/1

Samoa, Fiji - 1000/1

Tonga, - 2000/1

Romania, Japan, USA, Canada, Namibia, Portugal, Georgia - 5000/1

Previous winners:

1987 - New Zealand

1991 - Australia

1995 - South Africa

1999 - Australia

2003 - England

History:

The idea of having a world rugby completion, was first borne in the early 1980s, but it was 1983 before the International Rugby Board approached Australia and New Zealand, to do a feasibility study and at the IRB meeting of 1985, it was decided to go ahead with the tournament. The date had to be carefully selected, so as not to clash with other sports tournaments, such as the Olympics. The first World Cup was held in Australia and New Zealand, in May and June of 1987.

A fantastic gold trophy was procured from Garrards, in London and was named the William Webb Ellis Cup. At this stage, there were only 16 competing teams and South Africa was barred, due to the apartheid era. New Zealand beat France 29 - 9 in the first finals, to become the first World Cup holders.

The tournament was set to be held every 4 years and the next champions were Australia, who beat England in the playoffs, in 1991. By 1995, South Africa had changed government and re-entered the sporting world stage. They won the bid to host the tournament and it was the first time, that the entire contest was held in just 1 country. South Africa beat New Zealand 15 - 12, in extended play of the finals and became the 3rd country to win the cup.

Other countries joined in and in 1999 Australia were made world champs and in 2003 England were crowned kings. England are the defending champions. There are now 20 competing countries, officially entered, in this years contest.

Get a free fixture list and scoresheet for the World Cup here: http://dersalsites.com/southafricanbusiness/rugby-world-cup-2007/

Derek Robson is an up and coming, South African internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans and non U.S folk, to have equal opportunity and success on the internet. He and his wife Sally have started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles, as part of Dersalsites.

To remain informed of our progress, in trying to find satisfactory alternatives, by newsletter and mail and to get recommended tools and lessons and to start your journey to wealth, sign up here. It's free. Click this link: http://www.dersalsites.com/newsletter We will even throw in some free software for you.

Make sure you get our course on Internet Marketing. This is a comprehensive course comprising of over 243 pages, with pictures and videos to help explain exactly what to do. This is a fantastic e-course and is broken into 13 lessons. To get your free course, click here http://dersalsites.com/course

Visit my blog at http://dersalsites.com/southafricanbusiness

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Rugby World Cup 2007, France

The International Rugby Board (IRB) has announced the kick-off times for the 48 matches of Rugby World Cup 2007 to be played in France in September and October. Host nation France will kick-off the sixth Rugby World Cup Tournament against Argentina at the Stade de France Stadium in Paris at 9pm local time on Friday, September 7, while England will begin its defence of the Webb Ellis Cup against the USA in Lens the following day with the match kicking-off at 6pm local time.

The next Rugby World Cup will be hosted in France from 7 September to 20 October 2007. The games will be held at several venues in France (Lens, Montpellier, St-Etienne, Montpellier, St-Denis, Nantes, Lyon, Bordeaux, Paris, Toulouse and Marseilles). Some of the key pool matches will be played in Cardiff (Wales) and in Edinburgh (Scotland).

Toulouse, in the Aude, Languedoc, is one of rugby’s major epicentres. The Stade Toulousain team, which has provided a good many international players down the years, has been champion of France 17 times and went down in the history of the sport by becoming the first European clubs champion in 1996, a title that it won again in 2003.

Students began playing rugby locally in 1890 and it was in 1907 that Stade Toulousain was established. It won the first French championship title two years later, in 1909.

Have a look at the French team.

Colours: Blue, white and red?Nicknames: Les Bleus, Les Tricolores?Honours: Six Nations Grand Slam (2004, 2002), Five Nations Grand Slam (1968, 1977, 1981, 1987, 1997, 1998), World Cup runners-up (1987, 1999).

Coach: Studious Bernard Laporte has endured a see-saw existence since taken the reigns prior to the 1999 Rugby World Cup. World Cup finalists to fifth in the Six Nations, Grand Slam champions to losing a Test series to Argentina. Laporte has brought discipline and organisation to a traditionally volatile and flamboyant side, but has had trouble trying to mix the perfect cocktail time after time. Captain: Back in the captaincy saddle after the retirement of Fabien Galthié, Toulouse star Fabien Pelous is no stranger to leadership. A star performer in the second row or the back of the scrum, his presence in the French side is sometimes taken for granted.

Player(s) to watch: Toulouse centre Florian Fritz won both 2005 Player of the Year and 2005 Newcomer of the Year awards at the French 'Night of Rugby' in December 2005, and was first choice to partner Yannick Jauzion in both of November 2005's high-profile Tests against Australia and South Africa. He is also Jauzion's partner in the Toulouse centres as well, and Toulouse's back-line creativity needs little embellishment.

Have a look at the current French Squad: ( Jan 2007)

Backs: Jean-Baptiste Elissalde (Toulouse), Pierre Mignoni (Clermont), Dimitri Yachvili (Biarritz), Benjamin Boyet (Bourgoin), David Skrela (Stade Français), Damien Traille (Biarritz), Romain Cabannes (Biarritz), Florian Fritz (Toulouse), Yannick Jauzion (Toulouse), David Marty (Perpignan), Vincent Clerc (Toulouse), Christophe Dominici (Stade Français), Cédric Heymans (Toulouse), Aurélien Rougerie (Clermont), Thomas Castaignède (Saracens/ENG), Anthony Floch (Clermont), Clément Poitrenaud (Toulouse)?

?Forwards: Pieter de Villiers (Stade Français), Laurent Emmanuelli (Clermont), Sylvain Marconnet (Stade Français), Nicolas Mas (Perpignan), Olivier Milloud (Bourgoin), Jean-Baptiste Poux (Toulouse), Benoît August (Biarritz), Sébastien Bruno (Sale/ENG), Raphaël Ibañez (Wasps/ENG), Dimitri Szarzewski (Stade Français), Grégory Lamboley (Toulouse), Lionel Nallet (Castres), Pascal Papé (Castres), Fabien Pelous (Toulouse), Jerome Thion (Biarritz), Serge Betsen (Biarritz), Julien Bonnaire (Bourgoin), Sébastien Chabal (Sale/ENG), Thierry Dusautoir (Toulouse), Imanol Harinordoquy (Biarritz), Rémy Martin (Stade Français), Yannick Nyanga (Toulouse), Elvis Vermeulen (Clermont)

The south of France features very strongly- with well over half coming the region, and the majority of those coming from the Languedoc.

France is looking very strong to win in the RWC in 2007.

Tickets can be bought ahead of the match- mostly from Carrefour as well as many good web sites.

A very keen rugby supporter, the author moved from London after 15 years to live in the Languedoc, France region - the centre of rugby.

For further information, look at =>http://www.languedocpropertysale.co.uk

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Mike_Bowditch

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Rugby Training – Complete

Rugby is a multi directional contact sport. It involves strength and power, agility, speed and mobility. You go forward to score but are constantly running backwards then to the side then backwards again (depending on how good your team is). It requires the player to run at high and near maximal speeds and then either stop and change direction or even receive impact requiring a high amount of muscle control.

Why do body builders not make the greatest rugby players, after all these guys can lift BIG! It goes like this, our bodies have three primary planes of movement: forward, side and rotational. Throughout the course of a match a rugby player will exhaust all three planes; they have to efficient in all three planes. They will also have to lift as well a push and pull heavy objects from unstable positions. There is a huge risk of injury when attempting any of this as well as going into contact which, means that your body needs to be able to exert force through a stable base. The joints need to be protected at impact. Exercises should reciprocate these in them.

It's tough. So what can we do.

The speed and agility training should include exercises that will developed your ability to change direction, to stop and start again. Not to mention pickup speed/off the mark.

For the resistance training we will be looking at exercises that can create power and strength using as many muscle groups as possible.

The Magic Eight

Dead lifts
These will stretch out the hamstrings and provide strength for the lower back and glutele groups; essential for lifting and provide stability for hip joints. The boys in the boiler room will know all about this they will find this invaluable as they clear the rucks from people lying on the ball.

Rainbows
A power exercise that uses a huge range of muscles in top and lower extremities. Also developes core muscles which help cushion the spine against impact as well as provide essential power in the first phase of any movement. It also really works your shoulders through their whole range of movement so your passing is going to rocket. Put simply it is a must have.

Drag/Push Sled
Will develop power in more than one direction. This will really test both upper and lower body. In rugby the ability hold an opponent off is essential and a player will need to develop power through their hips to produce the power needed breakthrough tackles.

Multi Directional Lunges
Developing your ability push off though different directions. This will get the player to step off both feet with control and power, ideal for just about anyone who plays rugby. Why not chuck in a medicine ball and move it through different dictions as you complete lunge movements. This will work upper and lower body at the same time, having a tough impact on the core, thus having the carriover of stepping off one foot and being able to pass.

Hop Scotch
Most professional athletes will be doing upmarket forms of hopscotch. Provides change of direction, power and starting speed. This is how greatside steps are made.

Sprint and Back Pedal on Demand
Ability to change direction and of course works two different movements and muscle groups. This happens constantly through a game as they patterns in play change if your body can handle this then you can capitilise on the fact that your oponents mostly cant

Sit to Stand Up
Improves mental processing speed as well as total body agility and quickness. Rugby players are constantly having to make hits or move quickly form rucks they need to up and away.Besides you may haveto make another tackle. Not to mention split second decisions.

Controlled Stopping
Great for muscle control and ability to decelerate. Essential for a rugby player who might need to hit a ruck or make an important tackle to be able to balance corectly and not shoot straightpast his opponent. The more you can control the ability to stop the better you get at starting.

As you can see preparation for such a dynamic sport is not done simply by jogging to the local bar; we have to really think of what happens in a game and then replicate that through our training. This article demonstrates how different movements occur in games and what can be done to improve our ability to master them. Movement mastery is an underlying theme to what any athlete has to do to condition themselves for any sport because, once you can master a movement by balance and resistence then your ability to transfer these skills onto the pitch will increase; allowing you to perform movements and bouts of strength with more control and ease. By using the drills in the article you can change the way you approach your sport and be a winner in every facet of the game.

Good Luck

Guy Warren N.S.C.A-CPT

GuyWarren is a personal trainer and exercise specialist who has his own company in London. Guy has played for two professional rugby clubs and now specialising in strength and conditioning as well as integrated movement training. He has also appeared regularly on Channel 5 news as their sports specialist.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Guy_Warren

Rugby; Not a Sport for the Weak!

Most people in the United States know very little about the great sport of Rugby and those who have watched probably do not really get it much. They simply do not understand what they are watching. It is not like football as the action is on-going and it is a rough sport, certainly not for the weak. Many believe this is why the French are not so good at it? Although let's not pick on the French, as the Americans do not play rugby either. Yet, it is sort of an American Type of sport in a way, as we like to play rough.

The truth is whether or not Americans understand the sport of rugby is rather irrelevant because Rugby is not played in America anyway. I believe Americans should play rugby, because unlike Football there are no time outs to catch your breath and believe me when I tell you that; Rugby is Not a Sport for the Weak!

In the United States our Professional Football Players dress up in lots of pads and get paid huge amounts of money plus lots of endorsements and they expend massive brawn for a few seconds and the play ends. Although people call them superior athletes few of them could run a marathon. Rugby players on the other hand are severely under padded and under paid by our standards and they are in top shapes as they truly are top athletes. Consider all this in 2006.

"Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is a guest writer for Our Spokane Magazine in Spokane, Washington

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lance_Winslow

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Rugby - The Most Strength-Oriented Code of Football

Rugby players spend considerably more playing time in physical contact and contest with opponents than players in other forms of football.

Much of this contact involves extended grappling and wrestling, but what is also characteristic of rugby is the amount of time spent attempting to drive forward under loads considerably heavier than bodyweight. Obviously this is so in the scrum and maul, but also at the tackle. Both ball-carrier and tackler may strive to drive one another backward for an extended time after engagement. American football and rugby league are also primarily collision sports, but their tackles tend to terminate much more quickly.

Recognition of the importance of physical strength has led to a tendency for rugby selectors to favour increasingly heavier players even for backline positions. A modern professional rugby team is likely to average over 100kg bodyweight, compared with less than 95kg and less than 90kg for rugby league and Australian football respectively. Increased bodyweight appears to confer no advantage in soccer.

No valid size comparison can be made with players in American football. Its use of specialist teams means that individual players are only on the field for limited periods and therefore really massive players can be employed for the more static areas of engagement.

For professional rugby, players are often chosen on the basis of their size and apparent strength but are then not really expected to work to become significantly stronger. Much strength training in rugby appears to have the aim of generating hypertrophy - increasing muscle size and thus body mass - or of maintaining strength levels rather than seriously exploring the potential for markedly increased power.

Soccer, Australian football and rugby league are continuous-flow type games, whereas rugby and, to a much greater extent, American football are characterised by frequent stoppages and thus require lower levels of aerobic fitness. But I see little evidence that rugby coaches have fully realised the potential this provides to gain a competitive edge by requiring their players, backs and forwards, to seriously train for strength.

I would suggest that, given the development of very well-drilled coordinated defensive lines, the next stage in the evolution of rugby is likely to involve a concentration on the identification of and development of heavy, very mobile players who possess very high-range explosive strength.

Bruce Ross is CEO of MyoQuip, manufacturers of variable-resistance strength machines including the rugby-specific ScrumTruk http://www.MyoQuip.com.au http://myoquip.blogspot.com/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bruce_Ross

Monday, January 14, 2008

Latest News On The Rugby World Cup 2007 After The Second Week

In the last article we covered the grand opening of the Rugby World Cup 2007 and the results of the first 13 matches, played in the first week of the tournament. In this article, we pick up from there and record the results of the next 10 matches, played in the second week of the tournament.

Since the 13th match, in which South Africa gave England a hiding, another ten games have been played. The 14th match of the tournament was New Zealand versus Portugal. The Portugese fought the whole time and even managed to sneak a try past the All Blacks, which in itself was quite a feat. The All Blacks were far too god for them and ran in 16 tries, without too much effort. The final result was 108 - 13, which is the highest score recorded, so far. This result gave New Zealand an easy 5 points, and elevated them to the top of the log with a full 10 points, from 2 games.

The 15 th game was Wales against Australia and the Welsh never let the Aussies walk all over them. The Aussies only managed 4 tries to 2 from Wales, but still earned a full 5 points, which also placed them at the top of the log, in Pool B, with Australia, with 10 points.

Match 16 was played between Ireland and Georgia, but the Irish were unable to stamp their authority on the game and only managed to squeak in 2 tries against 1 from Georgia. The final score was 14 - 10, to Ireland, but they are going to have to elevate their game a lot, if they want to beat the likes of France and Argentina. They earned 4 points, but gave 1 away, to Georgia.

The next match, the 17th of the tournament, was Fiji versus Canada, played on the 16th of September. Fiji battled to overcome the Canadians the end result was only 29 -16, with 4 tries to 1.

Next up was the 2 tough South Seas teams doing battle. Samoa faced Tonga and the match was expected to be very physical, particularly amongst the burly forwards. I thought that Samoa would be victorious, but surprisingly Tonga got an upset victory with a score of 19 - 15. Tonga scored the only try of the match.

Also played on the 16th was the match between France and Namibia. France were expected to rally their troops after losing to Argentina in the opening game and show that they were still to be taken seriously. This was their opportunity against minnows, Namibia and that is exactly what they did. They ran in 12 tries to 1, won by 87 - 10 and picked up 5 valuable points. But is it a case of too much, too late, or can France still remain in contention?

The 20 th game was Scotland versus Romania. Scotland were expected to easily win this game and they did. The end score was 42 - 0, with 6 tries to nil.

Italy played Portugal in the 21st match of the World Cup 2007 and in my books this outcome was a toss up between the 2 fiery minnow teams. Both had showed their enthusiasm and determination in earlier games and were very evenly matched. Surprisingly, Italy ran all over Portugal and were convincing winners with a final score of 31 - 5. Italy scored 3 tries and Portugal were only able to get 1.

The 22nd game was played in Cardiff, between Wales, in their home grounds and Japan. Well, this match was also expected to be a walkover for Wales. Playing at home against sadly outclassed Japan, Wales should have run in big scores against the Japanese. This they did, managing 11 tries in the process. Japan failed to score any tries and the final score was 72 - 18, to Wales, netting them a full 5 points.

The 23rd match and the last for the second week, was France against Ireland. It was the second match in the week for France and after hammering Namibia a few days earlier, they had a far bigger game on their hands with Ireland, but they pulled through, by beating the Irish 25 - 3. France scored 2 tries and Ireland 0. After their disastrous beginning to the Rugby World Cup and after considerable criticism, France have rallied their troops and are still in contention for a top berth.

The real competition is in Pool D. South Africa, Australia and New Zealand seem certain winners of their pools, but France may have irrepairably damaged their chances, because they can only earn a max of 5 points in the next encounter, with Georgia, whereas Argentina still have 2 games in hand and could possibly earn 10 more points, putting them on 19 and ahead of France with 15.

So, after the second week of the Rugby World Cup 2007 and after 23 matches, the pools look like this:

Pool A : South Africa 9, Tonga 8, England 4, Samoa 1, USA 0 Pool B : Australia 10, Wales 10, Fiji 10, Japan 1, Canada 0 Pool C : New Zealand 10, Scotland 10, Italy 8, Romania 1, Portugal 0 Pool D : France 10, Argentina 9, Ireland 9, Georgia 1, Namibia 0

So, at this stage of the Rugby World Cup 2007 tournament, 44 teams have met, in 22 matches and the point standings, are as follows. Points/Games

New Zealand 10/2, Australia 10/2, Fiji 10/2, Scotland 10/2, Wales 10/3, France 10/3 South Africa 9/2, Argentina 9/2, Ireland 9/3 Tonga 8/2, Italy 8/3 England 4/2 Samoa 1/2, Romania 1/2, Georgia 1/2, Japan 1/3 USA 0/2, Canada 0/2, Namibia 0/2, Portugal 0/3

If I may hazard a guess at the quarter finals, I would say this scenario, is almost assured.

Winner B vs Second A definitely Australia vs probably Tonga or England
Winner C vs Second D definitely New Zealand vs probably France or Argentina
Winner A vs Second B almost definitely South Africa vs almost definitely Wales or Fiji
Winner D vs Second C probably Argentina or France vs almost definitely Scotland

I would even go as far as suggesting that the semis end up being

Australia vs New Zealand and South Africa vs Argentina

This would definitely say something about the superiority of southern hemisphere rugby

All being equal, New Zealand must surely beat Australia and play South Africa in the finals, but rugby is a strange game and anything can happen, especially as we are only half way through the tournament.

Saturday sees South Africa up against Tonga, but word is that the main Springbok players will be rested, until the quarter finals and Bob Skinstad and the "dirt trackers" will do battle against both Tonga and USA the next week. This is just a precautionary measure by Jake White to prevent any unnecessary injury to the star players. Then, Schalk Burger will also re-join the team. They will then be brought back to contest the quarter finals, the semis and any further ranking. We just hope that the 'Boks don't take the threats of Tonga and USA too lightly, but by the strength of the replacements, on the bench, it doesn't look that way at all.

Derek Robson is an up and coming, South African, internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans and non U.S folk, to have equal opportunity and success, on the internet. He is a syndicated article writer. He and his wife Sally, have started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles, as part of Dersalsites. For daily postings and articles, on Internet marketing, South African business, list building, affiliate marketing, the law of attraction, rugby and general topics, check his blogsite, at: http://dersalsites.com/southafricanbusiness

To remain informed of our progress, in trying to find satisfactory alternatives, by newsletter and mail and to get recommended tools and lessons and to start your journey to wealth, sign up here. It's free. Click this link: http://www.dersalsites.com/newsletter/ We will even throw in some free software for you, when you join.

Visit our new site for loads of articles and info on fitness and bodybuilding at http://dersalsites.com/crosstrainers/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Latest News On The Rugby World Cup 2007 After The First Week

Well, at last, the Rugby World Cup 2007 is underway. We have been waiting for what seems ages for this competition to eventually kick off and several matches have been played over the last few days. Some were unexpected upsets, but most results were as expected. One thing for sure, is that thousands of supporters have flocked to France to watch this great rugby spectacle. The various stadiums have recorded full house attendances and the money flooding in to France has already exceeded forecasts. Add to this scenario, millions of supporters around the world, literally glued to their television screens and we have a super duper world cup tournament.

There are too many games each day and too many teams and individual players, to be able to report fully on each match, so we will suffice with brief results and overviews, of the games played to date. Don't forget to download a free fixture list and results scoresheet at the bottom of the page.

The whole tournament was preceded by a glitzy opening ceremony, staged in the Stade de France, in St. Denis, immediately before the opening game between France and Argentina. Hundreds of gymnasts, musicians and dancers appeared in a huge show, meticulously choreographed, that went off like clockwork. The official anthems of the 2 competing countries were then aired and eventually the match started.

Rather disappointingly and I should imagine embarassingly for France, they appeared overwhelmed by the importance of the occasion and never really got themselves into the game. They stuttered and started and seemed nervous and unsettled. The Argentinians, on the other hand, seemed cool and calm and dedicated to the business at hand. Through sheer guts and strength they took an early lead and hammered the French into submission, at every possible opportunity. They were convincing winners and scored the only tri of the match. Although not much of a flowing game, this was a thrilling encounter. Many of the Argentinians actually play their club rugby in France, so were never intimidated by the French team. The final result was 17 - 12 to the Argentinians, which netted them a well deserved win and 4 points. The French had to be satisfied with a solitary point, from losing by less than 12 points.

The second match was New Zealand against Italy. A valiant Italy tried everything they could, but were never able to match the superb skills and far stronger Kiwis. The All Blacks showed why they are pre-tournament favourites, with a superb display, however it seemed that they never really upped their game to top gear. They scored 11 tries.There was no need to. Without too much effort, they emerged convincing winners, by 76 - 14. The plucky Italians were actually lucky to get their 14 points, through 2 relatively easy tries.

The third match was Australia against Japan and as expected, the Aussies all but annihilated Japan, by running in 13 tries to nil. The final result was 91 - 3 and netted Australia 5 easy points.

Fourth up was England versus USA. Again, England were expected to trounce the typically non rugby playing nation, but never really put up a convincing fight. Many were curious as to the condition of the defending cup holders, but England were almost disappointing. They were only able to get 3 tries to USA's one. Anyway they grabbed the victory with a final score of 28 - 10.

The fifth match between Wales and Canada was expected to be a little more evenly matched with Wales not having had that good a season and Canada, one of the few minnows who put up a good show in the last world cup tournament. Wales never really struggled and were able to beat Canada by 42 - 17, grabbing a quick 5 points in doing so. However, Wales only got themselves 5 tries, to the 3 scored by Canada and will have to up their game, as they tackle Australia next.

The sixth match was one many rugby fans were eagerly anticipating. The match between South Africa and Samoa was always thought of as a hard battle. The strong and heavy hitting Samoans have a reputation for their toughness and have put many an over eager adversary off the field through injury. The springboks are supposed to have been thoroughly prepared for this competition and are vaunted as likely winners of the cup. However, the Springboks looked nervous and took a full 20 minutes to get into the game. Only in the second half, did they start performing better and ran in 8 tries to Samoa's one. The end result was 59 - 7, but at half time, it still seemed that Samoa would be a very real challenge. Brian Lima, for the Samoans, made history, as the first player to have participated in the last 5 World Cup Rugby Competitions. Unfortunately he was not on the field for long, as a Kamikaze type tackle on Andre Pretorius, left him concussed and dazed. Jean de Villiers also left the field, with a torn bicep muscle and some bruised ribs. This is expected to keep him out of any further participation in the tournament. Anyway SA looked more settled and more clinical in the last 20 minutes and emerged victorious with a well deserved haul of 5 points.

Seventh on the fixture list was the match between Scotland and Portugal, where Scotland again, appeared to be far too strong, for the Portuguese and scored 7 tries, to 1. The Scots won by 56 - 10 and claimed 5 points for the win.

The eighth match and the last for the weekend was the clash between Ireland, playing the relatively minnow team from Namibia. The Irish won 32 - 17. I personally thought they would win by a far greater margin, but they took their deserved 5 points. Ireland managed 5 tries and Namibia got 2.

Ninth, on the fixture list, was the game between Georgia and Argentina, in their second game, since beating France. Argentina were far too good, for lowly Georgia and won the match by 33 - 3 with 4 tries, to nil.

The next match, the tenth game of the Rugby World Cup 2007, was USA vs Tonga. Tonga are a tough outfit, like Samoa and it was no surprise that they beat the US, by 25 - 15.

Next on the fixture list, was the match between Fiji and Japan. This was also pretty much a pre determined outcome, with Fiji winning, by 35 - 31, but Japan fought valiantly.

Next up, in the twelfth match, were Italy and Romania. The Italians are a feisty bunch and took the honours, with a score of 24 - 18.

The 13 th match, in the Rugby World Cup, and obviously a lucky 13, for the Springboks, was the much awaited clash, between South Africa and defending champions, England. This was the match, where England could have buried the Springbok's hopes of reaching the finals. With Jonny Wilkinson, not fit, to play for England, this was a major blow, to their chances, but as luck would have it, the Springboks had troubles of their own. A late citing, of top player and great flanker, Schalk Burger, for a supposed dangerous tackle, on a Samoan player, saw him banned for 4 matches. This was a terrific blow to the South Africans, who had already a lost play maker, in inside centre, Jean de Villiers, to injury and unfortunately also lost Pierre Spies, before they even arrived in France. An appeal against the suspension, saw the punishment reduced to 2 matches, but this still meant that Burger was out for the all important match against England, as well as the match against Tonga, on the 22nd of September.

The Springboks took charge of the game from the opening minutes and even with a narrowly missed try, still went into the break, with a commanding score of 20 - 0. After half time, they continued their strong attacks and rock solid defence, to completely shut England out of the game. Even when the whole bench got a run, in the last quarter, they managed to keep up the high standard of play. In all South Africa had a wonderful game, England never looked dangerous and the ref controlled the game very well. The final score was 36 - 0 and South Africa claimed another 5 points.

So, at the end of the first week and after 13 matches, we have the pools looking like this:

Pool A : South Africa 10, England 4, Tonga 4, Samoa 0, USA 0, Pool B : Australia 5, Wales 5, Fiji 5, Japan 1, Canada 0, Pool C : New Zealand 5, Scotland 5, Italy 4, Romania 1, Portugal 0, Pool D : Argentina 9, Ireland 5, France 1, Namibia 0, Georgia 0

By the way, one thing worth mentioning here, is the position of the so called minnow teams. Someone asked me, the other day, why some countries even bother to enter. Did you know that no country just enters their name on the list and they are not pulled out of a hat. They all need to qualify and they have to play so many games and win so many, in order to qualify. For the last 2 years, these little boys have been fighting it out, at the bottom of the log and those who have done best, then become eligible for the world Cup tournament. So, although they might seem insignificant, they have sufficient match time and enough wins, to qualify themselves for this tournament.

Get your free scorecard here: http://dersalsites.com/timetable_and_scorecard.pdf

Derek Robson is an up and coming, South African, internet marketer, with a vision of empowering all fellow South Africans and non U.S folk, to have equal opportunity and success, on the internet. He is a syndicated article writer. He and his wife Sally, have started a string of sites, resources, courses and articles, as part of Dersalsites. For daily postings and articles, on Internet marketing, South African business, list building, affiliate marketing, the law of attraction, rugby and general topics, check his blogsite, at: http://dersalsites.com/southafricanbusiness

To remain informed of our progress, in trying to find satisfactory alternatives, by newsletter and mail and to get recommended tools and lessons and to start your journey to wealth, sign up here. It's free. Click this link: http://www.dersalsites.com/newsletter/ We will even throw in some free software for you, when you join.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Derek_Robson

Saturday, January 12, 2008

Is There Silver To Be Had From New Zealand Rugby?

September 2007, and the rugby World up is taking place in France.
As seems to be the thing in global tournaments these days, some games are held in a different country, so rather bizarrely, New Zealand and Scotland are playing in Scotland. That's odd as it gives an extra advantage to the Scottish, but I'm more interested in the profit potential of another strange thing about this match...

In the run up to the game, the teams toss to see who is designated as the 'home' team. It doesn't make a huge amount of difference, but it does mean the home team gets to wear their normal choice of kit.
Scotland won the toss, and New Zealand therefore had to wear an 'away' kit.

Instead of their famous all black kit, they came out in what they called 'silver' jerseys. It looked grey to me, but I'm happy to go with silver.
The thing is, the Scottish team had jerseys which had panels of colour, some dark blue and some in a blue so light that it looked grey.

You might be ahead of me on this one, but with the New Zealand team now wearing top with panels in colours of black and grey, with both teams wearing dark shorts and socks, and you had the ridiculous scenario of both teams looking virtually the same!

It would have been better if the All Blacks had been allowed to stay with, er, all black!

Oh well, the result was decidedly normal, a big win for New Zealand, but I'm always interested in niche marketing, and particularly in sport, so the silver jerseys made me take note...

There are a couple of ways to profit from them.

One way would be to set up your own site.
You'd get to keep all the profits, but you'd have to create and maintain the site, handle all the sales and customer support issues, negotiate a deal with the shirt manufacturers and buy stock upfront.

That's not the way I prefer - I prefer to be an affiliate.
With this method you find a site that already sells the jerseys, and that has an affiliate programme.

Once you sign up, you send traffic to their site, but the traffic is logged as being sent by you. If anyone buys, you get paid a commission.

Obviously the commissions aren't as much as you'd get if you ran the site, but they can add up quickly, and remember your cost is nothing to do it.

I love the affiliate marketing model, and I love sport, so to combine the two always makes me smile, which is why I enjoyed seeing the potential of silver watching New Zealand play rugby!

Gordon Bryan is an internet marketer from the UK, and sports fan. To find out more about cashing in with niche marketing go to: http://www.gordonbryan.com/nicheriches.html

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gordon_Bryan

Friday, January 11, 2008

Heineken's Cup of Woe

It began as a faint aroma in a quiet area of France. By the time it had reached England and crossed the Peninnes; it had stunk to high Heaven. The fresh new faced baby, had finally thrown its toys out of the pram.

Like all sports early tango with Professionalism, Rugby's Flirtation began with starry eyes. Early Indications were that the fledging Heiniken cup would be the Champions league of Rugby. On an International front, Ireland gave the clearest indication that the new model would be a resounding success. By centrally contracting all its main players, it harnessed the traditional power bases of Irish Rugby its Provincial sides.

And how they embraced it. Ulster won the first Heineken cup for an Irish side in a competition. The unique triumph for an Irish side was diminished by the boycott of the English teams. The first seeds of discontent had just been sown; soon they would reap a bitter harvest.

By the time the mighty men of Munster had completed their epic odyssey, there were strong under currents of dissent emanating from France and England. The English clubs had been promised a slice of the Competition cake and were digging their heels in, as their dispute with the RFU gathered pace; enter the French. While history suggested they'd make strange allies, Crisp Dollar bills can smooth a multitude of cracks. With the French whining about the amount of competitive matches in World cup year, something had to give. The babies had out grown their play pens. With the success of the French and English home leagues, came the need to to re evaluate the Heineken Cup. While the clubs lacked leadership, the Unions held the sway.

Enter the French again in the shape of Serge Blanco. A stylish and highly successful former player, Blanco is proving equally effective off the pitch. He has garnered the seething unrest within the clubs, who are becoming increasingly disenchanted with the Unions cash cow. Echoes of the Major league Baseballs strike are in the offing. At the core is the usual suspect.. Money!

It was only a matter of time before this rotten Apple would spoil the Barrel. The big loser's will be the Irishand their celtic neighbours who don't have a Professional league of their own. The Competition had not only improved the standard of Irish Rugby, it had introduced a whole new Irish generation to the sport. The loss in revenue will be crippling, and thats just for starters. It would be unfair to blame Blanco for harnessing the power within the clubs. Rugby sold its soul when it embraced professionalism, it was like all sport, only intended to be a game.

Eddie Ryan is a regular contributor to Ireland's Own magazine and a former writer of the Tribune newspaper.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Eddie_Ryan

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Englishmen Tip the Rugby World on it's Head

On form, on history and on odds, neither France nor England was given much chance of getting through their world cup quarterfinal. But the beauty of sport is that all of those things become irrelevant when two teams run onto the field and the only thing that is important is which team can score the most points in 80 minutes. Against the odds, and certainly against all form, New Zealand and Australia make an early exit from the world cup, the hosts France advance to meet a team that just a few weeks ago looked challenged to make the playoffs, let alone defend their world championship.

England had struggled through their group - being smashed by South Africa 36-0 and then winning two matches that were effectively sudden death against Samoa and Tonga. Four years ago it was one man, Jonny Wilkinson, who sunk Australia in the World Cup final with a drop-goal, and since then Jonny has spent more time on the injury list than the field. His return to the English team has sparked a phenomenal turn around in form and the belief within the team when he is playing is always evident. One man should never make this much difference to a team, but for England, Jonny Wilkinson does.

In the 1991 World Cup Final between these teams England completely changed their positional style of rugby to a possession based game - running the ball at the Australians rather than kicking it to their dangerous back three. On that occasion the tactic allowed them to come close, but not close enough. The same tactics were employed again 16 years later, and this time with a positive result. For their part Australia just didn't seem to turn up. Even halfback George Gregan seemed abnormally reserved as England took it to the Aussies, once again exposing the weak Australian pack, and to the the delight of everyone outside of Australia came away with the win.

New Zealanders were quite thrilled with that result, until a few hours later they suffered their own upheaval as another Englishman came to the fore - this time English referee, Wayne Barnes. The match itself followed a traditional path for a New Zealand vs France game, with the French being extremely aggressive but the New Zealanders getting away to a comfortable enough lead. France tend to push the offside line and are very good at measuring a referee to see how much they can get away with. If they get away with it they push a little farther. This, more than anything explains why French victories over the All Blacks tend to be of the 'come-back' variety. In this game they struck a referee more interested in the ruck than the backs, and the All Black backline was effective shut down. The match was played between a French side playing hard-nosed rugby, and a New Zealand side devoid of an effective counter, and as tight matches do came down to a number of crucial turning points, all of which fell against the New Zealanders.

The three most prominent were:

Luke McCallister was sent off in the 46th minute with New Zealand in control, at least on the scoreboard. He, and every New Zealander you talk to will maintain the sin-binning was unwarranted. To add salt to the wound France took control of the match against a 14 man opposition, and to add further salt the same offense from a Frenchman 15 minutes later was not even penalized.

France scored a try - in the end the deciding try - from a forward pass, and a fairly glaring one at that.

Finally, with New Zealand 2 points down the referee signals advantage to New Zealand, seiing nothing on and knowing he has the advantage Luke McCallister takes a snap drop kick. The kick misses, no advantage is awarded, the ball is given back to France with less than 60 seconds on the clock.

Now normally I try and leave referee's well alone. Theirs is a thankless job. But in this case I have no hesitation in saying he cost New Zealand the match, and my pre-cup prediction that it would be not a team but a referee that would see the All Blacks miss out on another world cup came to painful fruition. But that's not to say they couldn't have won it despite the poor standard of refereeing. France lifted their game, and the All Blacks did not. Perhaps they had already seen Australia toppled by England and their minds were two weeks ahead in Paris, but the All Blacks didn't deliver in this game. New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clarke summed it up best when she said had New Zealand played better the refereeing, good or bad, would not have effected the outcome.

Tom Scott is a die hard supporter of the All Blacks and looks forward to our next shot at the cup - another 4 years from now.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tom_Scott

Monday, January 7, 2008

English Rugby - Back on Track ?

The 2004/5 season was a bad year for English international rugby. Those heady days of 2003 down under and Jonny Wilkinson’s last minute drop goal seemed a long way away as Wales completed a marvellous year by beating us 11-9 in the final match of the six nations.

It started well enough, business as usual in a 70-0 walloping of the Canadians and on the back of that, a hard fought, but impressive 32-16 win over the springboks. From there a mistake ridden performance against Australia allowed the Aussies a 19-21 win at Twickenham. In all, the autumn international results were not overly worrying. However the performance against Australia exposed some serious weaknesses in the England team which continued into the six nations in early 2005. Handling in particular was appalling and the discipline of the side seemed to have gone, giving away needless penalties in areas we should not have. The outcome of this was that the England team finished fourth in the table, our worst placing for many years, and headed into the summer with a lot of work to do.

So it was with a sense of trepidation that England fans sat down to watch the opening autumn international of the 2005/6 season against Australia, once again without the talismanic injury prone Jonny Wilkinson. A solid enough performance with English forwards dominating the game, but once again our backs looked short of ideas and were often to flat to break the aussies line. Andrew Sheridan was outstanding at prop as the English scrum destroyed the Australians, but too often the backs were unable to capitalise on good ball won. The big plus of this game, apart from the emergence of Sheridan as a world class player, was the assuredness of the performance of Charlie Hodgson, criticised for his kicking misses the previous year. At last it seemed as if England had a capable kicking replacement for the now mythical Jonny Wilkinson.

A good start, but the real test was still to come, having beaten probably the weakest Australian touring side for many years, England needed to step up a gear against the All Blacks a week later. New Zealand fielded their strongest side, and it was very impressive. Characterised by the fact that they could afford to leave players such as Joe Rokococo on the bench until the 80 th minute called for a spot of time wasting!

England competed well and it was a close game with England striking early through forward power as Martin Corry drove over the line. For the rest of the game, England struggled to restrain the powerful running of the kiwi’s and an England back line picked for its tackling ability rather than its flair had plenty of work to do in that department.. The referee had a big part to play in this match and seemed to set his stall out to not allow the English forwards to dominate the game, but in the second half yellow carded two kiwis for repeated scrum infringements as they struggled to contain the English pack. Overall the 19-23 score line was probably a fair reflection of the match.

The following weeks run out for some of the squad players against Samoa was pretty predictable fare. England dominating the match and could have had more points but for some poor decision making in trying to spin the ball wide too early.

So going into the six nations England seem to be in better shape than this time last year, yet still there are still several components lacking in the current line up. Martin Corry has proved a good tactical captain but is certainly no Martin Johnson or Lawrence Dallaglio. There is a visible lack of this type of character on the field, someone who is capable of taking the game by the scruff of the neck either by sheer force, or force of personality. Anyone who saw the emotion on Lawrence Dallaglio’s face before the world cup final will know exactly what this means. Whilst the forwards are performing well, there are still question marks over the throwing of Steve Thompson, who consistently fails to hit his line out calls and probably only retains his place on the strength of his all round ability.

In the backs, Mike Tindall retains his place as one of the best tackling centres in world rugby, but at times his handling and decision making are woeful. The unfortunate James Simpson Daniel who does at least provide some of the missing attacking flair managed only half of the match against Samoa before being injured. England are lacking that crucial element of attaching flair in the middle of the park. They need to find someone who can break the opposition line with moments of individual brilliance, such as the recently retired Jason Robinson. There are several contenders for this position yet to be given a serious run in the team as the England management under Andy Robinson seem to be more concerned about loosing individual matches than building a team to defend the world title in two years time. At scrum half England have, in Harry Ellis, finally found a replacement for the aging limbs of Matt Dawson and the future looks bright for Harry with Matt perhaps being retained as the experience in the squad.

There is a serious danger that this England team will once again be undone in the six nations this coming year with the French (provided they can hold their discipline) looking very strong. It will take a huge increase in creativity and consistency for England to regain their position as the northern hemisphere champions and perhaps the autumn internationals should have been used to blood new players, regardless of results

John Millward http://www.lazybugger.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=John_Millward

Friday, January 4, 2008

Differences Between Canadian and American Football

American and Canadian football both descended from rugby and began in Canada as a game played between British soldiers garrisoned in Montreal. The soldiers played a series of games against students at McGill University. McGill played several games against Harvard in 1874 and a tradition was born. Despite their mutual origins, the Canadian and the American game developed differently and now have substantially different rules and regulations.

The biggest difference between Canadian and American football is the size of the playing field. In Canada, football fields are 110 yards long and 65 yards wide. In America football fields are 100 yards long and 53 and 1/3 yards wide. The goal posts in Canadian football are placed at the front, rather than the back of the end zone which is also deeper in Canadian football than American.

Canadian football teams have twelve players as opposed to the eleven on American teams. Because the same number of players is required at the line of scrimmage in both games, this results in an extra backfield player on Canadian teams. This means that the typical Canadian offensive setup has two slot backs instead of a tight end and on defense, two defensive halfbacks and one safety instead of two safeties as is typical in the American game.

Another difference between the two games is the number of downs. Instead of four as in the American game, Canadian football has three. This results in a more pass and kick oriented game since there are fewer downs available for short-yardage running plays. The kicking rules are also slightly different with the kicker being able to recover and advance his own kick. For this reason, kicking is a much more integral part of Canadian football than American.

The biggest difference between the kicking rules in the two games is that there is no fair catch rule in Canadian football. In American football, if a kick returner thinks he will not be able to advance the ball after recovery, he can signal for a fair catch and be immune from contact. In Canadian football no player on the kicking team except the kicker and any players behind him on the field may ever be within 5 yards of the ball unless it has been touched by an opponent. Also, in Canadian football any kick that goes into the end zone is a live ball, except for successful field goals.

There are other minor differences as well including scoring, motion and time rules but they are not as significant as the major differences noted here.

Jonathon Hardcastle writes articles on many topics including Football, Games, and Recreation

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Jonathon_Hardcastle

Brian o' Driscoll the David Beckham of Irish Rugby

The announcement of Brian O' Driscoll as IRB player of the year underlined the importance of style over substance. O' Driscoll in truth wasn't even Ireland's best player in the six nations, never mind player of the tournament. That award was won by a country mile by the excellent Gordon Darcy. It sadly raises the issue of profile in modern day sport. The higher the profile the better the chance of recognition, when the gongs are being handed out. In fairness to Brian, he looked every bit as surprised as the rest of the rugby fraternity. Awards are at the best of times, just an excuse for marketing the cream within your crop. Like David Beckham before him, O' Driscoll is incredibly media friendly,a marketing agency's dream. In modern day sport a status is difficult to aquire, and even more difficult to lose.

After bursting on the scene with his try fest in the Paris, Brian's legend gathered apace for the next couple of years. Like Becks who stole the lime light at Old Trafford, the golden boy of Irish Rugby could do no wrong. One try scoring pass or a great tackle a game was by now enough, to elevate the 'Bod' to the top of the page. A flick pass here and a feint there, and commentators were drolling into their Microphones. Objectivity flew out the window, as the by now Teflon coated centre; could do no wrong. Except of course if you recall his no show in Cardiff as Golden boots Gavin Henson and the fiery dragons of Wales, fed our super hero a large cache of Kryptonite. Brian's no show was blamed on the lack of quality service, a suitable refuge for all sporting kop- outs. The endorsements kept rolling in as well as the scarcely deserved plaudits. Rugby purists were noting that teams by now had little difficulty, snuffing out the life of Brian.

Another no show against Munster in the all Irish Heineken Cup semi-final,confirmed that our Messiah was human after all. The electric pace and lightning change of body shape, don't look quite so threatening now. The edge appears to have gone off O'Driscoll's game. The fire in the belly, that light the touch paper to the legend; is flickering out. Our hero already appears to be eyeing the Tunnel. Luckily Eddie O' Sullivan wont be kicking any boots in his direction; aka Alex Ferguson. The only Hair dryer treatment the 'Bod' will be receiving will be on his own wavy locks. O'Driscoll's place in the pantheon of Irish rugby is already assured. Ireland is the home of myth and Legend, the myth that Brian O' Driscoll is a true great of the oval ball game is already assured.

Eddie Ryan is a regular contributor to Ireland's Own magazine.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Eddie_Ryan

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Are the All Blacks Chokers? Revisited

I had been out to a musical last night and got home a little late, missing the first 48 seconds of the All Blacks last world cup pool match. I was 12 seconds late, the New Zealanders had already scored their first try.

In fact, the All Blacks have scored a try within 5 minutes in every pool match they have played at this tournament. They have hardly been put under any pressure in accounting for Italy 76-14, Portugal 108-13, Scotland 40-0 and now the Romanians 85-8. They have scored 309 points in conceding just 35 with an average score of 77-9. Once again they have been the only side to truly dominate every opponent in pool play on the scoreboard.

And yet New Zealanders are nervous. They hold this All Black side to such high standards that a path through pool play where no team comes within 40 points of them is naturally put down to weak opponents rather than good performances by their team. They are bothered by error rates, lack of composure and an inability to keep their try-line intact against so called 'lesser' teams. In the back of everyones mind is the burning desire for this team to finally win the world cup, but the secret suspicion that, once again, we will see our team play one bad game in four years, and lose the opportunity to bring the cup home.

With the preliminaries out of the way, the New Zealand public now needs to start wanting wins, not impressive moves or inflated scorelines. From here on in New Zealand can look forward to playing their two tri-nations rivals, and the pre-tournament favorites France. In other words, to win the world cup, the All Blacks must beat 3 of the top 5 teams in the world on consecutive weekends. While in any single one of those matches the All Blacks will be going in favorites, each of the teams has the potential to score a victory over the All Blacks.

To shake the choker tag, the All Blacks need to maintain their own standards and deny their three opponents the chance to 'get up' for the big game. So let's take a look at the record against their three most likely opponents.

France will be dissappointed to have to go the hard route to the final. They have played well in patches, but without the self assurance of a French team in form. They had wanted to build up a air of invincability leading into the world cup, but that plan was set alight last November with the All Blacks putting them away comfortably twice at Lyon and Paris. Since then they have lost to England at Twickenham, the two 'B-team' tests in New Zealand and then to Argentina in the opener of the world cup. The All Blacks will only have to think back two world cups though to know that you cannot write off a french team no matter how many times you have defeated them recently or how badly they have been playing. France had the wood on the All Blacks during the 90's, but this decade has been all black for les Bleus. We may see that after the quater final the All Blacks have still not had an opponent come within 40 points. At the same time we could see the All Blacks watching the rest of the tournament from the stands. This will certainly be a game not to miss.

Until a week ago I would have said the Australians had an easy path into the semi-finals against a hapless English side or a Tongan side that would have already played their final. But the return of Johnny Wilkinson appears to have restored structure to the English side, and while I still expect Australia to progress, the English may well press them more than we previously expected. Australia have an ability to upset the All Blacks when it counts. Their team is filled with smart players - qualified lawyers, accountants and Doctors. They have an uncanny ability to make the All Blacks play 'dumb' rugby and take advantage of it. Once again, this is a game the All blacks should win comfortably, but could be the end of their world cup quest just as easily.

The Springboks can expect to make it to the final, but will no doubt be carrying some bumps and bruises when they do. They will be playing the Fijian side that this week eliminated the Welsh from the tournament, and this is a dangerous prospect for the South Africans. As they showed against Samoa and Tonga, the South Africans can struggle with the Island teams. This is because they are so often drawn into the island style of game. South Africans are immensely proud and when met with the confrontational style of the islanders, they often feel the need to fight like with like, when it is their discipline and structure which will see them home. Fiji will have trouble backing up their big effort against Wales against a vastly superior South African outfit. After Fiji the South Africans can look forward to some real trench warfare against the Argentinians(who have probably the easiest semi-final).

Importantly South Africa rate themselves against the All Blacks. While Australia believe they can beat the All Blacks on any given day, the South Africans believe they SHOULD beat the All Blacks on any given day. Both teams will be happy to have gone through a tough path to the final, neither side will be happy with anything worse than the world cup trophy.

There is no doubt the All Blacks are favorites in all their remaining games, and whether they can shake the 'choker' tag will depend on how well they can maintain their structure, impose themselves on the game and ultimately get the result they should.

Tom Scott is a die hard supporter of the All Blacks looks forward to seeing New Zealand be the first team to retain a world cup in 2011.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Tom_Scott

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

All Eyes Are On The Rugby World Cup

The Rugby World Cup is only 20 years old, and only comes around every four years. Yet there is increasing interest in the competition each time.

Rugby has its dramas just like football, but as football has veered off down the path of becoming more of a business, die hard sports fans are beginning to notice rugby is all sport.

Around four billion people around the world are expected to tune into the six week tournament, a true testament that rugby is a top global sport. Compare that to the estimated ten million people who tuned in to watch that thrilling final between England and Australia four years ago in Sydney.

The hosts of the Rugby World Cup 2007 are none other that our continental neighbours, France. After losing the World Cup final to Italy in 2006, and missing out on the summer Olympics 2012 bid, the Rugby World Cup has brought a renewed sense of confidence to the French. France will host 48 games in total over the course of the six week competition, culminating in the final at the Stade de France on the 20th October.

Since the opening game in September, the Rugby World Cup 2007 has so far had fans glued to their television screens. Underdogs Argentina beating France, then making it into the final knock out rounds, England’s stumbling start, the Welsh and Irish ejected after the group phase, and with England gaining momentum I’m sure the tournament will have a few more surprises in store before October 20th.

Thousands of English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish supporters have already made the trip to France to catch a glimpse of some of this year’s action. With France being one of Britain’s favourite holiday destinations it is no surprise that travel to France has increased.

The Stade de France holds no less than 80,000 and provides a fitting venue for the final on October 20th. The Stade de France is located in Saint-Denis, just outside Paris. The best way to reach to stadium is by train. Eurostar tickets will be in high demand, as the journey between London and Paris currently takes around 2 hours 30 minutes. The Stade de France stop is then 35 minutes by train from Gare du Nord.

So regardless of whether you go to the final, or if you’re one of the millions of TV viewers, the 2007 final looks set to be quite a spectacle.

Robert Trains is a keen sports enthusiast and regularly posts topical news and comments on one of his many blogs. Also view Roberts website on snow trains.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Robert_Trains